Back

Quantifying Inaccuracies in Modeling COVID-19 Pandemic within a Continuous Time Picture

Baldea, I.

2020-09-08 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.09.05.20188755 medRxiv
Show abstract

Typically, mathematical simulation studies on COVID-19 pandemic forecasting are based on deterministic differential equations which assume that both the number (n) of individuals in various epidemiological classes and the time (t) on which they depend are quantities that vary continuous. This picture contrasts with the discrete representation of n and t underlying the real epidemiological data reported in terms daily numbers of infection cases, for which a description based on finite difference equations would be more adequate. Adopting a logistic growth framework, in this paper we present a quantitative analysis of the errors introduced by the continuous time description. This analysis reveals that, although the height of the epidemiological curve maximum is essentially unaffected, the position [Formula] obtained within the continuous time representation is systematically shifted backwards in time with respect to the position [Formula] predicted within the discrete time representation. Rather counterintuitively, the magnitude of this temporal shift [Formula] is basically insensitive to changes in infection rate{kappa} . For a broad range of{kappa} values deduced from COVID-19 data at extreme situations (exponential growth in time and complete lockdown), we found a rather robust estimate{tau} [~=] -2.65 day-1. Being obtained without any particular assumption, the present mathematical results apply to logistic growth in general without any limitation to a specific real system.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.