Back

Automated Deep Learning-based Multi-class Fluid Segmentation in Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Images

Oakley, J. D.; Sodhi, S. K.; Russakoff, D. B.; Choudhry, N.

2020-09-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.09.01.278259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based, fully automated, multi-class, macular fluid segmentation algorithm relative to expert annotations in a heterogeneous population of confirmed wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) subjects. MethodsTwenty-two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) volumes of the macula from 22 from different individuals with wAMD were manually annotated by two expert graders. These results were compared using cross-validation (CV) to automated segmentations using a deep learning-based algorithm encoding spatial information about retinal tissue as an additional input to the network. The algorithm detects and delineates fluid regions in the OCT data, differentiating between intra- and sub-retinal fluid (IRF, SRF), as well as fluid resulting from in serous pigment epithelial detachments (PED). Standard metrics for fluid detection and quantification were used to evaluate performance. ResultsThe per slice receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curves (AUCs) for each of these fluid types were 0.90, 0.94 and 0.94 for IRF, SRF and PED, respectively. Per volume results were 0.94 and 0.88 for IRF and PED (SRF being present in all cases). The correlation of fluid volume between the expert graders and the algorithm were 0.99 for IRF, 0.99 for SRF and 0.82 for PED. ConclusionsAutomated, deep learning-based segmentation is able to accurately detect and quantify different macular fluid types in SS-OCT data on par with expert graders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.