Back

Mental healthcare and service user impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a UK survey of staff working with people with intellectual disability and developmental disorders

Sheehan, R.; Dalton-Locke, C.; Ali, A.; Totsika, V.; Vera San Juan, N.; Hassiotis, A.

2020-09-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2020.09.01.20178848
Show abstract

BackgroundVery little is known about the impact of previous epidemics on the care of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, particularly in terms of mental health services. The COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to exacerbate existing health inequalities as well as expose gaps in service provision for this vulnerable population group. MethodsWe investigated the responses of 648 staff working in mental healthcare with people with intellectual disabilities and/or developmental disabilities. Participants contributed to a UK-wide online survey undertaken by the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit between 22nd April and 12th May 2020. Recruitment was via professional networks, social media and third sector organisations. Quantitative data describing staff experience over three domains (challenges at work, service user and carer problems, sources of help at work) were summarised and differences between groups explored using Chi square tests. Content analysis was used to organise qualitative data focusing on service changes in response to the pandemic. ResultsThe majority of survey respondents worked in the NHS and in community mental health services. One third had managerial responsibility. Major concerns expressed by mental healthcare staff were: difficulties for service users due to lack of access to usual support networks and health and social care services during the pandemic; and difficulties maintaining adequate levels of support secondary to increased service user need. Staff reported having to quickly adopt new digital ways of working was challenging; nevertheless, free text responses identified remote working as the innovation that staff would most like to retain after the pandemic subsides. ConclusionsUnderstanding the experiences of staff working across different settings in mental healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic is essential in guiding contingency planning and fostering service developments to ensure the health of this vulnerable group is protected in any future disease outbreaks.

Matching journals

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 21 published papers
#1
91× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 41%
12.5%
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
178× avg
4
BMC Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 20 published papers
#1
92× avg
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
6
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 15%
2.0× avg
7
BJPsych Open
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.3%
58× avg
8
Psychological Medicine
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 52 published papers
Top 3%
8.6× avg
9
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.8%
33× avg
10
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 3%
12× avg
11
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 3%
7.8× avg
12
BMJ Mental Health
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
13
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 12%
1.8× avg
15
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 22%
1.2%
16
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 5%
3.8× avg
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
5.8× avg
18
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Elsevier BV · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
9.8× avg
19
Public Health in Practice
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
10× avg
20
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 7%
3.1× avg
21
JMIR Research Protocols
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
4.6× avg
22
Public Health
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 9%
3.1× avg
23
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg