Predictive Value Of Smell And Taste Test Vs PCR-Rt SARS-COV-2 And Rapid Diagnostic Tests In The Diagnosis Of Infection By COVID-19. A Prospective Multi-Centric Study.
Pieruzzini, R.; Ayala, C.; Navas, J.; Rodriguez, W. C.; Parra, N.; Luque, E.; Sanchez, A.; Gonzalez, S.; Hagobian, A.; Grullon, A.; Diaz, K.; Morales, M.; De Jesus, M.; Pena, S.; Rodriguez, L.; Pena, L.; Asaro, A.; Magris, M.
Show abstract
There is a relationship between smell and taste disturbances and coronavirus infection. These symptoms have been considered the best predictor of coronavirus infection, for this reason, it was decided to evaluate the predictive value of the smell and taste test and its association with the results of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-RT and rapid diagnostic tests. in the diagnosis of pathology. Methodology: 248 patients divided into 3 groups: asymptomatic, symptomatic without chemosensory disorders, and chemosensory disorders alone. All of them underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR-RT, a rapid diagnostic test and a test of Venezuelan smell and basic taste at the beginning. Weekly follow-up with smell and taste test and SARS-CoV-2 PCR-RT until recovery. Results: 20.56% of patients had smell and taste disorders to a variable degree and were positive by SARS-CoV-PCR-RT. 2.15.3% of patients with chemosensory disorders were negative for COVID-19. The positive predictive value of the smell and taste test was 57.3; Sensitivity 41.13% and specificity 69.35%. There were no statistically significant differences by age, sex and chemosensory disorders. The predominant chemosensory disorder was the combination of mild hyposmia and hypogeusia and appeared in the company of other symptoms. Recovery occurred in an average of 8.5 days, asynchronously with the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negativization, which occurred up to more than 15 days after the senses recovered. Maximum time of negativization of the RT-PCR of 34 days. Conclusion: chemosensory disorders are a symptom and / or sign of coronavirus disease but cannot be considered as predictors of said disease in this population studied. The gold standard remains the SARS-CoV-2 PCR-RT test. Rapid diagnostic tests should be used for follow-up. Recommendations: it is necessary to expand the sample, include routine psychophysical smell and taste tests to screen cases and take race and virus mutations into consideration to explain behavior in certain populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 93%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical diagnosis of COVID-19: a prompt, feasible, and sensitive diagnostic tool for COVID-19 based on a 1,757-patient cohort (The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 diagnosis) 94%
- Clearing the fog: Is Hydroxychloroquine effective in reducing Corona virus disease-2019 progression: A randomized controlled trial 92%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Cases Infected with Omicron subvariants and XBB recombinant variant 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Niger State: A Pilot Cross Sectional Study 92%
- Impact on Mental Health of students due to restriction caused by COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study 91%
- Covid-19 Associated Hepatitis in Children (CAHC) during the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Central India: Is it a complication or transient phenomenon 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 93%
- Chemosensory dysfunctions induced by COVID-19 can persist up to 7 months: A study of over 700 healthcare workers 91%
- Persisting Chemosensory Impairments in 366 Healthcare Workers Following COVID-19: An 11-Month Follow-up 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.