Back

Microfluidic nano-scale qPCR enables ultra-sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2

Xie, X.; Gjorgjieva, T.; Attieh, Z.; Dieng, M. M.; Arnoux, M.; Khair, M.; Moussa, Y.; Al Jallaf, F.; Rahiman, N.; Jackson, C. A.; Victoria, Z.; Zafar, M.; Ali, R.; Piano, F.; Gunsalus, K. C.; Idaghdour, Y.

2020-09-01 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.28.20183970
Show abstract

BackgroundA major challenge in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic is the high false-negative rate of the commonly used standard RT-PCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical samples. Accurate detection is particularly challenging in samples with low viral loads that are below the limit of detection (LoD) of standard one- or two-step RT-PCR methods. MethodsWe implement a three-step approach for SARS-CoV-2 detection and quantification that employs reverse transcription, targeted cDNA preamplification and nano-scale qPCR based on the Fluidigm 192.24 microfluidic chip. We validate the method using both positive controls and nasopharyngeal swab samples. ResultsUsing SARS-CoV-2 synthetic RNA and plasmid controls, we demonstrate that the addition of a preamplification step enhances the LoD of the Fluidigm method by 1,000-fold, enabling detection below 1 copy/l. We applied this method to analyze 182 clinical NP swab samples previously diagnosed using a standard RT-qPCR protocol (91 positive, 91 negative) and demonstrate reproducible detection of SARS-CoV-2 over five orders of magnitude (< 1 to 106 viral copies/l). Crucially, we detect SARS-CoV-2 with relatively low viral load estimates (<1 to 40 viral copies/l) in 17 samples with negative clinical diagnosis, indicating a potential false negative rate of 18.7% by clinical diagnostic procedures. ConclusionThe three-step nano-scale RT-qPCR method can robustly detect SARS-CoV-2 in samples with relatively low viral loads (< 1 viral copy/l) and has the potential to reduce the false negative rate of standard RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections. SummaryWe test, implement and report the results of a microfluidic RT-qPCR assay system involving sequential RT, preamplification and nano-scale qPCR that can robustly detect SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples with viral loads less than 1 copy/ul.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 9%
9.7%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 17%
9.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.9%
9.7%
4
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 69%
4.8%
6
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Analytical Chemistry
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
mSphere
based on 27 papers
Top 0.5%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 12%
2.2%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
2.2%
13
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
20
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
23
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
25
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 13%
1.1%
26
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
27
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Med
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
0.6%
29
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.6%
30
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
0.6%