Back

Quantifying respiratory tract deposition of airborne graphene nanoplatelets: The impact of plate-like shape and folded structure

Gao, H.; Hammer, T.; Zhang, X.; He, W.; Xu, G.; Wang, J.

2020-09-01 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2020.08.28.20183608
Show abstract

The booming development of commercial products containing graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) triggers growing concerns over their release into the air. Precise prediction of human respiratory system deposition of airborne GNPs, especially in alveolar region, is very important for inhalation exposure assessment. In this study, the pulmonary deposition of airborne GNPs was predicted by the multiple-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model with consideration of GNPs plate-like shape and folded structure effect. Different equivalent diameters of GNPs were derived and utilized to describe different deposition mechanisms in the MPPD model. Both of small GNPs (geometric lateral size dg < 0.1 m) and large GNPs (dg > 10 m) had high deposition fractions in human respiratory system. The total deposition fractions for 0.1 m and 30 m GNPs were 41.6% and 75.6%, respectively. Most of the small GNPs deposited in the alveolar region, while the large GNPs deposited in the head airways. The aerodynamic diameter of GNPs was much smaller than the geometric lateral dimension due to the nanoscale thickness. For GNPs with geometric lateral size of 30 m, the aerodynamic diameter was 2.98 m. The small aerodynamic diameter of plate-like GNPs enabled deposition in the alveolar region, and folded GNPs had higher alveolar deposition than planar GNPs. Heavy breathing led to higher GNPs deposition fraction in head airways and lower deposition fractions in the alveolar region than resting breathing. Our results reveal that large GNPs can have small enough aerodynamic diameters to be respirable and deposit beyond the ciliated airways. The plate-like morphology and folded structure of GNPs resulted in higher alveolar deposition compared to spherical particles.

Matching journals

1
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 2%
3.7× avg
2
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
American Chemical Society (ACS) · based on 16 published papers
#1
226× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 36%
13.4%
4
Environmental Research
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 0.4%
53× avg
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 3%
6.8× avg
6
Water Research
Elsevier BV · based on 26 published papers
Top 0.6%
31× avg
7
Science of The Total Environment
Elsevier BV · based on 80 published papers
Top 2%
8.1× avg
8
Environment International
Elsevier BV · based on 22 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
9
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
40× avg
10
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.7%
26× avg
11
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 16%
1.7× avg
12
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
9.8× avg
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 6%
3.9× avg
14
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
15
PeerJ
PeerJ · based on 46 published papers
Top 9%
2.6× avg
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 219 published papers
Top 18%
0.9%
17
Journal of Occupational Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
18
Environmental Science & Technology
American Chemical Society (ACS) · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
10× avg
19
ACS ES&T Water
American Chemical Society (ACS) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
24× avg