Panel Based Error Corrected Next Generation Sequencing versus Flow Cytometry to Detect Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Patkar, N.; Kakirde, C.; Shaikh, A. F.; Salve, R.; Bhanshe, P.; Chatterjee, G.; Rajpal, S.; Joshi, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Kodgule, R.; Ghoghale, S.; Deshpande, N.; Shetty, D.; Hasan, K. S.; Jain, H.; Bagal, B.; Menon, H.; Khattry, N.; Sengar, M.; Subramanian, P.; Gujral, S.
Show abstract
We accrued 201 patients of adult AML treated with conventional therapy, in morphological remission and evaluated MRD using sensitive error corrected next generation sequencing (NGS-MRD) and multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM-MRD) at the end of induction (PI) and consolidation (PC). Nearly 71% of patients harbored PI NGS-MRD and 40.9% harbored PC NGS-MRD (median VAF 0.76%). Patients harboring NGS-MRD had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p=0.003), inferior overall survival (p=0.001) and relapse free survival (p<0.001) as compared to NGS-MRD negative patients. NGS-MRD was predictive of inferior outcome in intermediate cytogenetic risk and demonstrated potential in favorable cytogenetic risk AML. Patients who cleared PI NGS-MRD had a significantly improved survival as compared to patients who became negative subsequently indicating that kinetics of NGS-MRD clearance was of paramount importance. NGS-MRD identified over 80% of cases identified by flow cytometry at PI time point whereas FCM identified 49.3% identified by NGS. Only a fraction of cases were truly missed by NGS as compared to FCM-MRD. NGS-MRD emerged as the most important independent prognostic factor predictive of inferior outcome (p<0.001). We demonstrate a widely applicable, scalable NGS-MRD approach that is clinically informative and advantageous when compared to FCM-MRD in AML treated with conventional therapies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.