Back

Wastewater sample site selection to estimate geographically-resolved community prevalence of COVID-19: A research protocol

Yeager, R. A.; Holm, R. H.; Saurabh, K.; Fuqua, J. L.; Talley, D.; Bhatnagar, A.; Smith, T. R.

2020-08-25 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.23.20180224
Show abstract

BackgroundWastewater monitoring for virus infections within communities can complement conventional clinical surveillance. Currently, most SARS-CoV-2 testing is performed during clinical encounters with symptomatic individuals, and therefore likely underrepresents actual population prevalence. Randomized testing on a regular basis to estimate population-level infection rates is prohibitively costly and is hampered by a range of barriers associated with participation in clinical research. In comparison, community-level fecal monitoring can be performed through wastewater surveillance and can effectively surveil communities with less temporal lag than other surveillance methods. However, epidemiologically-defined protocols for wastewater sample site selection are lacking. MethodsHerein we describe methods for developing a geographically-resolved population-level wastewater sampling approach in Jefferson County, Kentucky which may have general applicability for cities throughout the United States. This approach was developed by the selection of sampling locations along sewer lines transporting raw wastewater from geographically and demographically distinct areas that correspond with locations where random testing of residents occurs. ConclusionsDevelopment of this protocol for population-level sampling for SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in wastewater can be utilized to inform consistent wastewater monitoring among cities for up-to-date and geographically-resolved information on COVID-19 prevalence within communities. This information could substantially supplement public health surveillance of COVID-19 and thus serve to better guide targeted mitigation strategies throughout the United States.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 0.6%
13.8%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.6%
3
ACS ES&T Water
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
mSphere
based on 27 papers
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Environmental Science & Technology
based on 16 papers
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
Water Research
based on 26 papers
Top 0.5%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.5%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
based on 16 papers
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
mSystems
based on 16 papers
Top 0.7%
2.5%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
12
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 13%
1.6%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
1.6%
15
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
17
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 19%
1.2%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 10%
1.2%
20
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
21
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
23
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 20%
0.7%