Back

Ensemble Forecasts of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the U.S.

Ray, E. L.; Wattanachit, N.; Niemi, J.; Kanji, A. H.; House, K.; Cramer, E. Y.; Bracher, J.; Zheng, A.; Yamana, T. K.; Xiong, X.; Woody, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Walraven, R. L.; Tomar, V.; Sherratt, K.; Sheldon, D.; Reiner, R. C.; Prakash, B. A.; Osthus, D.; Li, M. L.; Lee, E. C.; Koyluoglu, U.; Keskinocak, P.; Gu, Y.; Gu, Q.; George, G. E.; Espana, G.; Corsetti, S.; Chhatwal, J.; Cavany, S.; Biegel, H.; Ben-Nun, M.; Walker, J.; Slayton, R.; Lopez, V.; Biggerstaff, M.; Johansson, M. A.; Reich, N. G.; COVID-19 Forecast Hub Consortium,

2020-08-22 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.19.20177493 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has driven demand for forecasts to guide policy and planning. Previous research has suggested that combining forecasts from multiple models into a single "ensemble" forecast can increase the robustness of forecasts. Here we evaluate the real-time application of an open, collaborative ensemble to forecast deaths attributable to COVID-19 in the U.S. MethodsBeginning on April 13, 2020, we collected and combined one- to four-week ahead forecasts of cumulative deaths for U.S. jurisdictions in standardized, probabilistic formats to generate real-time, publicly available ensemble forecasts. We evaluated the point prediction accuracy and calibration of these forecasts compared to reported deaths. ResultsAnalysis of 2,512 ensemble forecasts made April 27 to July 20 with outcomes observed in the weeks ending May 23 through July 25, 2020 revealed precise short-term forecasts, with accuracy deteriorating at longer prediction horizons of up to four weeks. At all prediction horizons, the prediction intervals were well calibrated with 92-96% of observations falling within the rounded 95% prediction intervals. ConclusionsThis analysis demonstrates that real-time, publicly available ensemble forecasts issued in April-July 2020 provided robust short-term predictions of reported COVID-19 deaths in the United States. With the ongoing need for forecasts of impacts and resource needs for the COVID-19 response, the results underscore the importance of combining multiple probabilistic models and assessing forecast skill at different prediction horizons. Careful development, assessment, and communication of ensemble forecasts can provide reliable insight to public health decision makers.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
13
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
28
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
30
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%