Precision Breast Cancer Screening with a Polygenic Risk Score
Tasa, T.; Puustusmaa, M.; Tonisson, N.; Kolk, B.; Padrik, P.
Show abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women in the world. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (SNPs) independently associated with BC. The effects of such SNPs can be combined into a single polygenic risk score (PRS). Stratification of women according to PRS could be introduced to primary and secondary prevention. Our aim was to revalidate a PRS model and to develop a pipeline for individualizing breast cancer screening. Previously published PRS models for predicting the risk of breast cancer were collected from the literature. Models were validated on the Estonian Biobank (EGC) dataset consisting of 32,548 quality-controlled genotypes with 315 prevalent and 365 incident BC cases and on 249,062 samples in the UK Biobank dataset consisting of 8637 prevalent and 6825 incident cases. The best performing model was selected based on the AUC in prevalent data and independently validated in both incident datasets. Using Estonian BC background information, we performed absolute risk simulations and developed individual risk-based recommendations for prevention. The best-performing PRS included 2803 SNPs. The C-index of the Cox regression model associating BC status with PRS was 0.656 (SE = 0.05) with a hazard ratio of 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.5 - 1.84) on the incident EGC dataset. The PRS is able to stratify individuals with more than a 3-fold risk increase. The observed 10-year risks of individuals in the 99th percentile exceeded the 1st percentile more than 10-fold. PRS is a powerful predictor of breast cancer risk. Currently, PRS scores are not implemented in routine BC screening. We have developed PRS-based recommendations for personalized primary and secondary prevention and our approach is easily adaptable to other nationalities by using population-specific background data of other genetically similar populations.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying 31 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci using data from genome-wide association studies conducted in Asian and European women 94%
- Polygenic risk, susceptibility genes, and breast cancer over the life course 93%
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort 96%
- A genome-wide association study of mammographic texture variation 93%
- Putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are under-represented in public variant classification databases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank 91%
- Classification of Variants of Reduced Penetrance in High Penetrance Cancer Susceptibility Genes: Framework for Genetics Clinicians and Clinical Scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group-UK) 90%
- Impact of genetic counselling strategy on diagnostic yield and workload for whole genome sequencing-based tumour diagnostics 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rho GTPase transcriptional activity and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis 94%
- Migration rather than proliferation transcriptomic signatures are strongly associated with breast cancer patient survival 93%
- Increased adiposity is protective for breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study using up to 132,413 breast cancer cases and 85,907 prostate cancer cases. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating alternative Polygenic Risk Scores into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model 96%
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Diffsig: Associating Risk Factors With Mutational Signatures 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.