Back

The Prevalence of Non-Adherence in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bourque, G.; Ilin, J. V.; Ruzicka, M.; Davis, A.; Hundemer, G.; Hiremath, S.

2020-08-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.08.14.20175125 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundResistant hypertension is quite prevalent and a risk factor for cardiovascular events. Patients with suspected resistant hypertension undergo more screening intensity for secondary hypertension, despite some of them being non-adherent to prescribed pharmacotherapy. The prevalence of non-adherence in this setting varies from about 5 to 80% in the published literature. Apart from the wide range, the relation between method of assessment and prevalence is not well established. Our objective was to establish the overall prevalence of non-adherence in the apparent treatment resistant hypertension population, explore causes of heterogeneity, and evaluate the effect of the method of assessment on the estimate of non-adherence. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE Classic+EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles. Details about the method of adherence assessment were extracted from each included article and grouped into direct and indirect. Pooled analysis was performed using the random effects model and heterogeneity was explored with metaregression and subgroup analyses. ResultsThe literature search yielded 1428 studies, of which 36 were included. The pooled prevalence of non-adherence was 35% (95% confidence interval 25 - 46 %). For indirect methods of adherence assessment, it was 25% (95% CI 15 - 39 %), whereas for direct methods of assessment, it was 44% (95% CI 32 - 57 %). Metaregression suggested gender, age, and time of publication as potential factors contributing to the heterogeneity. ConclusionsNon-adherence to pharmacotherapy is quite common in resistant hypertension, with the prevalence varying with the methods of assessment. Brief SummaryResistant hypertension is known to be a risk factor for cardiovascular events. These patients also undergo higher screening intensity for secondary hypertension. However, not all patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension have true resistant hypertension, with some of them being non-adherent to prescribed pharmacotherapy. This systematic review aims to establish the overall prevalence of non-adherence in the apparent treatment resistant hypertension population and assess the relative contributions of non-adherence assessed with direct and indirect measures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
5
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%