Back

A Patient-based Model to Investigate the Effect of Micro-structure Scars on the Optogenetic Defibrillation Success: A Computational Modelling Approach

Zakeri Zafarghandi, E.; BAHRAMI, F.

2020-08-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.08.13.249250 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigates the role of the microstructure of real scars in the success of optogenetic defibrillation. To reduce the computational cost of high-order models (like Ten Tusscher Model, TTM) for a single cell as well as to take advantage of their ability to generate a more realistic output, we developed a low-order model of optogenetic cardiac tissue based on the modified Alieve-Panfilov single-cell model and estimated its parameters using a TTM. Two-dimensional electrophysiological cardiac tissue models were produced including different scar shapes that were extracted from Late Gadolinium-Enhanced (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging data set of 10 patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The scar shapes were classified based on four criteria: transmurality, relative area, scar entropy, and interface length. Scar with the highest 25% of the relative area showed 25% of successful cases, this ratio is 27%, and 25% for a scar with the most top 25% of entropy, and transmurality, respectively. In comparison, the proportions are 61.54%, 44.44%, and 61.76%, for the lowest 25% of the area, entropy, and transmurality. We also investigated the efficacy of various methods for light-sensitive cells distribution within the cardiac tissue with scar. Four types of distributions were defined. Defibrillation within tissues with 0.1 light-sensitive out of all cells was 15 to 25% more successful than their counterparts with 0.05 light-sensitive cells. Lastly, we examined the effect of an earlier stimulation on the success probability of defibrillation. Our results indicated that inducing 0.5 msec earlier resulted in a roughly 15% rise in successful cases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.