Back

Clinical characteristics and Outcomes of 500 patients with COVID Pneumonia : Results from a Single center(Southend University Hospital)

Koduri, G.; Gokaraju, S.; Darda, M.; Warrier, V.; Duta, I.; Hayes, F.; El Sayed, I.; Ahmed, Y. N.

2020-08-14 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.13.20163030 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo characterise the clinical features of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in a single centre during the first epidemic wave and explore potential predictive variables associated with outcomes such as mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation, using baseline clinical parameters. MethodologyWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic records for demographic, clinical and laboratory data, imaging and outcomes for 500 hospitalised patients between February 20th and May 7th 2020 from Southend University Hospital, Essex, UK. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors relevant to outcome. ResultsThe mean age of the cohort admitted to hospital with Covid-19, was 69.4 and 290 (58%) were over 70. The majority were Caucasians, 437 (87%) with [&le;]2 comorbidities 280(56%). Most common were hypertension 186(37%), Cardiovascular disease 178(36%) and Diabetes 128 (26%), represented in a larger proportion on the mortality group. Mean CFS was 4 with Non - Survivors had significantly higher CFS 5 vs 3 in survivors, p<0.001. In addition, Mean CRP was significantly higher 150 vs 90, p<0.001 in Non-Survivors. We observed the baseline predictors for mortality were age, CFS and CRP. ConclusionsIn this single centre study, older and frailer patients with more comorbidities and a higher baseline CRP and creatinine were risk factors for worse outcomes. Integrated frailty and age-based risk stratification are essential, in addition to monitoring SFR (Sp02/Fi02) and inflammatory markers throughout the disease course to allow for early intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.