Back

Performance of an automated anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay in prepandemic cohorts

Riester, E.; Krieter, B.; Findeisen, P.; Laimighofer, M.; Schoenfeld, K.; Laengin, T.; Niederhauser, C.

2020-08-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.07.20169987
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Elecsys(R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics) was developed to provide an accurate and reliable method for the detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We evaluated the specificity of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay in prepandemic sample cohorts across five sites in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. MethodsSpecificity of the immunoassay was evaluated using anonymised, frozen, residual serum and/or plasma samples from blood donors or routine diagnostic testing. All samples were collected before September 2019 and therefore presumed negative for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Cohorts included samples from blood donors, pregnant women and paediatric patients. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. ResultsOverall specificities for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay in 9575 samples from blood donors (n = 6714) and diagnostic specimens (n = 2861) were 99.82% (95% CI 99.69-99.91) and 99.93% (95% CI 99.75-99.99), respectively. Among 2256 samples from pregnant women, specificity was 99.91% (95% CI 99.68-99.99). Among 205 paediatric samples, specificity was 100% (95% CI 98.22-100). ConclusionThe Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay demonstrated a very high specificity across blood donor samples and diagnostic specimens from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Our findings support the use of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay as a potential tool for determination of an immune response following previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in the general population, including in blood donors, pregnant women and paediatric populations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.7%
11.2%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 4%
7.6%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 62%
6.4%
4
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 21%
5.1%
5
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 40%
4.7%
7
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.7%
3.9%
8
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 25%
2.4%
12
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
13
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
16
Infectious Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
18
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Transfusion
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
23
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
24
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
25
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
27
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 22%
0.8%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 21%
0.7%