Back

Digoxin is Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation without Concomitant Heart Failure

Tysarowski, M.; Nigri, R.; Patel, B.; Suero-Abreu, G. A.; Pratap, B.; Bastawrose, J.; Aziz, J.; Kim, H.; Herzog, E.; Aziz, E. F.

2020-08-11 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.08.07.20169888
Show abstract

IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke and death. Digitalis has been used for more than 200 years to treat heart conditions, including AF, and its use remains controversial due to uncertain long-term morbidity and mortality. MethodsWe conducted a cohort study of hospitalized patients with AF assessing the effects of digoxin on longterm all-cause mortality. Patients were divided into two groups: with and without heart failure (HF). We performed multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality depending on digoxin treatment and used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in background characteristics between treatment groups. ResultsAmong 2179 consecutive patients hospitalized with AF, the median age was 73 {+/-} 14, and 52.5% of patients were male, 49% had HF, and 18.8% were discharged on digoxin. Median left ventricular ejection fraction in the whole cohort was 60 (IQR 40-65). Among patients with HF, 34.5% had preserved, 17.3% had mid-range and 48.1% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean follow-up time was 3 {+/-} 2.05 years. In patients without HF there was a statistically significant increased mortality in the digoxin subgroup after propensity score matching (HR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.42-3.51, p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with HF, there was no difference in mortality between the treatment groups (p = 0.92). ConclusionsDigoxin use in our study was associated with increased mortality in patients with AF and without concomitant HF.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 2%
10.9%
2
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
7.4%
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
7.4%
6
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 0.6%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 69%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
4.9%
9
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
4.4%
10
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
4.4%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 56%
2.7%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 32%
2.7%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
14
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
15
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
16
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
21
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%