Back

Whole Care Home Testing for Covid-19 in a Local Authority Area in the United Kingdom

Starling, A.; White, E.; Showell, D.; Wyllie, D.; Kapadia, S.; Balakrishnan, R.

2020-08-11 public and global health
10.1101/2020.08.06.20162859
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo describe the point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in care homes reporting low numbers of cases of COVID-19. DesignA cross-sectional study of care homes, ascertaining perceived disease burden using interviews with care home managers and SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in residents and staff using nose and throat swabbing. Setting15 Care homes in Essex, United Kingdom, all of which had reported either zero or one case of COVID-19 to the Health Protection Team. Participants912 residents and staff of care homes were tested. Residents were eligible to be tested regardless of symptoms. Main outcome measureDetection of SARS-CoV-2 in residents and staff. ResultsIn the 15 care homes studied, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 23 (5.2%) of 441 residents. Of these 23, 21/23 (91%) were asymptomatic as reported by the care home managers. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 8/471 (1.7%) of staff. This differs from that in residents (p=0.003). ConclusionsThe studys findings suggest that symptoms, as reported by care home managers, are an insensitive method of defining the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection in nursing homes. Viral detection from residents is more common than from staff. Microbiological screening is a more sensitive method for defining the extent of SARS-CoV-2 in care homes than managerial reporting of resident symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 40%
12.7%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 10%
11.1%
3
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 0.5%
5.3%
5
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Journal of Hospital Infection
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
3.0%
7
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 0.6%
2.8%
8
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 0.6%
2.8%
9
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 5%
2.4%
11
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 12%
2.3%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 12%
2.3%
13
The Lancet Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Thorax
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 9%
1.2%
17
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 25%
0.8%
20
Journal of Public Health
based on 23 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
based on 10 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMJ Public Health
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 25%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
29
BMC Geriatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%