Back

Whole Care Home Testing for Covid-19 in a Local Authority Area in the United Kingdom

Starling, A.; White, E.; Showell, D.; Wyllie, D.; Kapadia, S.; Balakrishnan, R.

2020-08-11 public and global health
10.1101/2020.08.06.20162859 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo describe the point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in care homes reporting low numbers of cases of COVID-19. DesignA cross-sectional study of care homes, ascertaining perceived disease burden using interviews with care home managers and SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in residents and staff using nose and throat swabbing. Setting15 Care homes in Essex, United Kingdom, all of which had reported either zero or one case of COVID-19 to the Health Protection Team. Participants912 residents and staff of care homes were tested. Residents were eligible to be tested regardless of symptoms. Main outcome measureDetection of SARS-CoV-2 in residents and staff. ResultsIn the 15 care homes studied, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 23 (5.2%) of 441 residents. Of these 23, 21/23 (91%) were asymptomatic as reported by the care home managers. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 8/471 (1.7%) of staff. This differs from that in residents (p=0.003). ConclusionsThe studys findings suggest that symptoms, as reported by care home managers, are an insensitive method of defining the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection in nursing homes. Viral detection from residents is more common than from staff. Microbiological screening is a more sensitive method for defining the extent of SARS-CoV-2 in care homes than managerial reporting of resident symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.