Pre-attentive processing of neutral and emotional sounds in congenital amusia
Pralus, A.; Gomot, M.; Graves, J.; Cholvy, F.; Fornoni, L.; Tillmann, B.; Caclin, A.
Show abstract
Congenital amusia is a life-long deficit of musical processing. This deficit can extend to the processing of language and in particular, emotional prosody. In a previous behavioral study, we revealed that while amusic individuals had difficulties in explicitly recognizing emotions for short vowels, they rated the emotional intensity of these same vowels as did their matched control participants. This finding led to the hypothesis that congenital amusics might be impaired for explicit emotional prosody recognition, but not for its implicit processing. With the aim to investigate amusics automatic processing of prosody, the present study measured electroencephalography (EEG) when participants listened passively to vowels presented within an oddball paradigm. Emotionally neutral vowel served as the standard and either emotional (anger and sadness) or neutral vowels as deviants. Evoked potentials were compared between participants with congenital amusia and control participants matched in age, education, and musical training. The MMN was rather preserved for all deviants in amusia, whereas an earlier negative component was found decreased in amplitude in amusics compared to controls for the neutral and sadness deviants. For the most salient deviant (anger), the P3a was decreased in amplitude for amusics compared to controls. These results showed some preserved automatic detection of emotional deviance in amusia despite an early deficit to process subtle acoustic changes. In addition, the automatic attentional shift in response to salient deviants at later processing stages was reduced in amusics in comparison to the controls. In the three ERPs related to the deviance, between-group differences were larger over bilateral prefrontal areas, previously shown to display functional impairments in congenital amusia. Our present study thus provides further understanding of the dichotomy between implicit and explicit processing in congenital amusia, in particular for vocal stimuli with emotional content.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced mismatch negativity in harmonic compared to inharmonic sound sequences 96%
- Trait Anxiety Effects on Late Phase Threatening Speech Processing: Evidence from EEG 95%
- Semantic Reversal Anomalies under the Microscope: Task and Modality Influences on Language-Associated Event-Related Potentials 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicit auditory perception of local and global irregularities in passive listening condition 96%
- An ERP investigation of accented isolated single word processing 96%
- Usefulness of a familiarity signal during recognition depends on test format: Neurocognitive evidence for a core assumption of the CLS framework 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Word stress representations are language specific: evidence from event-related brain potentials 97%
- Reconsidering electrophysiological markers of response inhibition in light of trigger failures in the stop-signal task 94%
- The P600 and P3 ERP components are linked to the task-evoked pupillary response as a correlate of norepinephrine activity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The P300 as marker of inhibitory control - fact or fiction? 95%
- Different hemispheric lateralization for periodicity and formant structure of vowels in the auditory cortex and its changes between childhood and adulthood 94%
- Salience-weighted agreement feature hierarchy modulates language comprehension. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- When inefficient speech-motor control affects speech comprehension: atypical electrophysiological correlates of language prediction in stuttering 96%
- Multisensory processes can compensate for attention deficits in schizophrenia 95%
- Fast unconscious processing of emotional stimuli in early stages of the visual cortex 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.