Back

Functional drug susceptibility testing based on biophysical measurements predicts patient outcome in glioblastoma patient-derived neurosphere models

Stockslager, M. A.; Malinowski, S.; Touat, M.; Yoon, J. C.; Geduldig, J.; Mirza, M.; Kim, A. S.; Wen, P. Y.; Chow, K.-H.; Ligon, K. L.; Manalis, S. R.

2020-08-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.08.05.238154 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional precision medicine aims to match each cancer patient to the most effective treatment by performing ex vivo drug susceptibility testing on the patients tumor cells. Despite promising feasibility studies, functional drug susceptibility testing is not yet used in clinical oncology practice to make treatment decisions. Often, functional testing approaches have measured ex vivo drug response using metabolic assays such as CellTiter-Glo, which measures ATP as a proxy for numbers of viable cells. As a complement to these existing metabolic drug response assays, we evaluated whether biophysical assays based on cell mass (the suspended microchannel resonator mass assay) or size as measured by microscopy (the IncuCyte assay) could be used as a readout for ex vivo drug response. Using these biophysical assays, we profiled the ex vivo temozolomide responses of a retrospective cohort of 70 glioblastoma patient-derived neurosphere models with matched clinical outcomes and found that both biophysical assays predicted patients overall survival with similar power to MGMT promoter methylation, the clinical gold standard biomarker for predicting temozolomide response in glioblastoma. These findings suggest that biophysical assays could be a useful complement to existing metabolic approaches as "universal biomarkers" to measure sensitivity or resistance to anti-cancer drugs with a wide variety of cytostatic or cytotoxic mechanisms. One-sentence summaryBy using biophysical assays to perform ex vivo drug susceptibility testing on 70 glioblastoma patient-derived neurosphere models, we find that functional testing predicts the duration that patients survive when treated with temozolomide, the standard of care chemotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
11
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
21
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%