Back

Indirect Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity and Outcomes of Transcatheter and Surgical Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in England

Martin, G. P.; Curzen, N.; Goodwin, A.; Nolan, J.; Balacumaraswami, L.; Ludman, P.; Kontopantelis, E.; Wu, J.; Gale, C. P.; de Belder, M.; Mamas, M. A.

2020-08-11 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.08.05.20168922
Show abstract

BackgroundAortic stenosis requires timely treatment with either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to investigate the indirect impact of COVID-19 on national SAVR and TAVR activity and outcomes. MethodsThe UK TAVR Registry and the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit were used to identify all TAVR and SAVR procedures in England, between January 2017 and June 2020. The number of isolated AVR, AVR+coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, AVR+other surgery and TAVR procedures per month was calculated. Separate negative binomial regression models were fit to monthly procedural counts, with functions of time as covariates, to estimate the expected change in activity during COVID-19. ResultsWe included 13376 TAVR cases, 12328 isolated AVR cases, 7829 AVR+CABG cases, and 6014 AVR+Other cases. Prior to March 2020 (UK lockdown), monthly TAVR activity was rising, with a slight decrease in SAVR activity during 2019. We observed a rapid and significant drop in TAVR and SAVR activity during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for elective cases. Cumulatively, over the period March to June 2020, we estimated an expected 2294 (95% CI 1872, 2716) cases of severe aortic stenosis who have not received treatment. ConclusionThis study has demonstrated a significant decrease in TAVR and SAVR activity in England following the COVID-19 outbreak. This situation should be monitored closely, to ensure that monthly activity rapidly returns to expected levels. There is potential for significant backlog in the near-to-medium term, and potential for increased mortality in this population.

Matching journals

1
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
#1
111× avg
2
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
139× avg
3
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 9%
3.1× avg
4
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
22× avg
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 4%
8.9× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 77%
3.0%
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
8
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
5.2× avg
10
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
11
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 1%
10× avg
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
13
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 8%
3.2× avg
14
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
20× avg
15
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
16
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 3%
13× avg
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
18
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
19
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 39%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
15× avg
22
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 20%
0.8%
23
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
24
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 86%
0.7%
25
Wellcome Open Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 34 published papers
Top 4%
4.2× avg