Back

Discontinuity of the deadly infection rate for the COVID-19 pandemia due to lockdown measures

Sabio Vera, A.

2020-08-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.05.20168880 medRxiv
Show abstract

An asymmetric version of the classical Kermack-McKendrick description of an epidemic evolution is presented in terms of four independent parameters. This is enough to obtain an accurate description of the different stages of the COVID-19 pandemia in any country for the reported daily and total number of casualties due to the infection. The asymmetry accounts for lockdown effects introduced to reduce the impact of the epidemic outburst. A set of new variables allows for an analytic study of the evolution of the system before and after the lockdown measures are put in place. A continuous matching is possible for all variables in the system apart from the time dependence of the infection rate. An analytic expression is obtained for this discontinuity which is proposed as a good quantity to gauge the efficiency of the lockdown measures. A study of this variable for different countries is performed.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.9%
3
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
5
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
6
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
7
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
8
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
New Journal of Physics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%