Back

Investigation into the Release of Respiratory Aerosols by Brass Instruments and Mitigation Measures with Respect to Covid-19

Parker, A. S.; Crookston, K.

2020-08-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.07.31.20165837 medRxiv
Show abstract

There are a number of recent studies detailing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) via both Droplet and Aerosol airborne particle routes of infection. Because of this, it is necessary to understand the release of different sized particles in activities such as playing brass instruments in order for an analysis of risk to take place for such activities. In this investigation, the quantity and size of particles released by brass instruments while they are played was analysed for 7 different types of brass instrument. This was contrasted with the same individuals breathing as a comparison for more general activities as well as the effect of a mitigating polycotton barrier over the end of their instruments. To investigate the particles released, the particles were size sorted and counted with a six-channel laser particle counter. Multiple measurements were made by each individual in each condition investigated. The mean concentration exiting across all instruments measured was found to be 1.21x107 {+/-}1.03x106 Aerosol type particles/m3 and 1.43x104 {+/-}9.01x102 Droplet type particles/m3 per minute. When breathing, the mean count was 1.61x107 {+/-}1.33x106 Aerosol type particle/m3 and 5.45x103 {+/-}1.20x103 Droplet type particles/m3. When playing with a barrier cover, the mean number of particles emitted fell to 2.60x106 {+/-}2.11x105 Aerosol type particle/m3 and 5.20x103 {+/-}8.02x102 Droplet type particles/m3. This barrier represented an average 78.5% reduction for the number of respiratory Aerosol type particles and 63.8% reduction for Droplet type particles compared to playing an instrument without the barrier covering. It was investigated what effect playing for a more extended period of time had on the release of particles with comparisons made to singing, breathing and covering the instruments bell ends with a barrier cap. This showed that the mean number of Aerosol type particles produced while playing was 5.38x107 {+/-}3.15x106 Aerosol type particles/m3 produced and showed a significant drop in Aerosol type particle production when playing with a barrier used, with a mean average of 2.28x106{+/-}8.01x104 Aerosol type particles/m3. Both breathing and singing showed consistent numbers of Aerosol type particles produced with means of 6.59x107 {+/-}7.94x105 Aerosol type particles/m3 and 5.28x107 {+/-}5.36x105 Aerosol type particles/m3 respectively. This showed a drop in mean Aerosol type particles/m of 95.7% when using a barrier cap compared to playing without a barrier. It is concluded that, while playing a brass instrument, the propagation of respiratory Aerosols does occur and, to a smaller extent, so do Droplet size particles, but at a lower level than when the subject was breathing without an instrument. Finally, it was shown that the use of a barrier cap on the bell end of the instrument offers a significant reduction in the production of respiratory Aerosols into the immediate surroundings, which offers a possible mitigation method for playing in groups from the release of Aerosol type particles, especially in hard to ventilate spaces. FundingThis study was supported by funds from Arts Council England covering salary support for AP and KC. The cleanroom facility and particle counter were provisioned by Centre Stage Ltd. The funders did not have a role in the experimental design, data collection, analysis or decision to publish and content of the manuscript. Competing InterestsThe authors have declared working for Brass Bands England, which exists to support brass bands in England and the wider UK.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
3
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.4%
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%