Detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers: results from a large-scale screening program based on rapid serological testing.
Carozzi, F. M.; Cusi, M. G.; Pistello, M.; Galli, L.; Bartoloni, A.; Anichini, G.; Azzari, C.; Emdin, M.; Gandolfo, C.; Maggi, F.; Mantengoli, E.; Moriondo, M.; Moscato, G.; Paganini, I.; Passino, C.; Profili, F.; Voller, F.; Zappa, M.; Quattrone, F.; Rossolini, G. M.; Francesconi, P.; SARS-CoV-2 Serosurvey Tuscan Working Group,
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of two available rapid immunological tests for identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies and their subsequent application to a regional screening of health care workers (HCW) in Tuscany (Italy). Designmeasures of accuracy and HCW serological surveillance Setting6 major health facilities in Tuscany, Italy. Participants17,098 HCW of the Tuscany Region. Measures of accuracy were estimated to assess sensitivity in 176 hospitalized Covid-19 clinical subjects at least 14 days after a diagnostic PCR-positive assay result. Specificity was assessed in 295 sera biobanked in the pre-Covid-19 era in winter or summer 2013-14 Main outcome measuresSensitivity and specificity, and 95% confidence intervals, were measured using two serological tests, named T-1 and T-2. Positive and Negative predictive values were estimated at different levels of prevalence. HCW of the health centers were tested using the serological tests, with a follow-up nasopharyngeal PCR-test swab in positive tested cases. ResultsSensitivity was estimated as 99% (95%CI: 95%-100%) and 97% (95% CI: 90%-100%), whereas specificity was the 95% and 92%, for Test T-1 and T-2 respectively. In the historical samples IgM cross-reactions were detected in sera collected during the winter period, probably linked to other human coronaviruses. Out of the 17,098 tested, 3.1% have shown the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, among them 6.8% were positive at PCR follow-up test on nasopharyngeal swabs. ConclusionBased on the low prevalence estimate observed in this survey, the use of serological test as a stand-alone test is not justified to assess the individual immunity status. Serological tests showed good performance and might be useful in an integrated surveillance, for identification of infected subjects and their contacts as required by the policy of contact tracing, with the aim to reduce the risk of dissemination, especially in health service facilities.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Poland 94%
- Performance Evaluation Of A SARS-COV-2 Rapid Antigentest: Test Performance In The Community In The Netherlands 93%
- Serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated factors in health care workers in a “non-COVID” hospital in Mexico City 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests 93%
- Cumulative seroprevalence among healthcare workers after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, Central America 93%
- Non-occupational and occupational factors associated with specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Hospital Workers – a multicentre cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 94%
- Dutch participatory surveillance framework for evaluating evolutionary changes on SARS-CoV-2 affecting Rapid Diagnostic Test sensitivity in 2022 - 2023. 93%
- High Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Ethiopian healthcare workers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibodies anti-SARS-CoV2 time-course in patients and vaccinated subjects: an evaluation of the harmonization of two different methods 92%
- COVID-19 Screening And Monitoring Of Asymptomatic Health Workers With A Rapid Serological Test 92%
- Rapid Serological Tests Have A Role In Asymptomatic Health Workers COVID-19 Screening 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extending influenza surveillance to detect non-influenza respiratory viruses of public health relevance: analysis of surveillance data, 2015-2019, Belgium 92%
- Using routine emergency department data for syndromic surveillance of acute respiratory illness in Germany, week 10-2017 and 10-2021 91%
- Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.