Back

Readmission Rates and Medication Selection for Patients with Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction

Kramer, T.; Vogler, C.; Robinson, R.; Bhattarai, M.

2020-07-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.29.20163956 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has less guideline driven treatment options due to a lack of trials demonstrating medications with improved clinical outcomes for this patient population. The primary objective of this study is to determine which medications and dosages are related to high readmission rates for HFpEF patients. MethodsA retrospective, single center, chart review was performed on patients with HFpEF at an academic medical center. Heart failure patients ages between 18-89 with an ejection fraction [≥]45% from a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were included. Primary outcomes include 30-day all cause readmission rates, prescribing patterns, and avoidance of potentially harmful medications. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess potential risk factors. ResultsThis study analyzed 455 patient admissions. Univariate analysis shows patients who were not readmitted were more likely to be on furosemide (54% vs 42%; p = 0.019). Conversely, readmitted patients were more likely to be taking bumetanide (4% vs 1%; p = 0.039). Lisinopril was the only angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) associated with lower readmission rates (p = 0.036). Multivariate logistic regression showed bumetanide on admission (OR 14.6, p = 0.001), discharged on rosuvastatin (OR 6.29, p = 0.003) and meloxicam therapy (OR 6.33, p = 0.003) to be independent predictors of hospital readmission. ConclusionThree independent pharmacologic predictors for 30-day readmissions for patients with HFpEF were therapy with bumetanide, meloxicam, or rosuvastatin. Further research is needed to clarify the significance of these results.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%