Improving Cycle Corrections in Discrete Time Markov Models: A Gaussian Quadrature Approach
Srivastava, T.; Strong, M.; Stevenson, M. D.; Dodd, P. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionDiscrete-time Markov models are widely used within health economic modelling. Analyses usually associate costs and health outcomes with health states and calculate totals for each decision option over some timeframe. Frequently, a correction method (e.g. half-cycle correction) is applied to unadjusted model outputs to yield an approximation to an assumed underlying continuous-time Markov model. In this study, we introduce a novel approximation method based on Gaussian Quadrature (GQ). MethodsWe exploited analytical results for time-homogeneous Markov chains to derive a new GQ-based approximation, which is applied to an unadjusted discrete-time model output. The GQ method approximates a continuous-time Markov model result by approximating a correction matrix, formulated as an integral, using a weighted sum of integrand values at specified points. GQ approximations can be made arbitrarily accurate by increasing order of the approximation. We compared the first five orders of GQ approximation with four existing cycle correction methods (half-cycle correction, trapezoidal and Simpsons 1/3 and 3/8 rules) across 100,000 randomly generated input parameter-sets. ResultsWe show that first-order GQ method is identical to half-cycle correction method, which is itself equivalent to trapezoidal method. The second-order GQ is identical to Simpsons 1/3 method. The third, fourth and fifth order GQ methods are novel in this context and provide increasingly accurate approximations to the output of the continuoustime model. In our simulation study, fifth-order GQ method outperformed other existing methods in over 99.8% of simulations. Of the existing methods, Simpsons 1/3 rule performed the best. ConclusionOur novel GQ-based approximation outperforms other cycle correction methods for time-homogeneous models. The method is easy to implement, and R code and an Excel workbook are provided as supplementary materials.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information 95%
- A Tutorial on Discrete Event Simulation Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example 93%
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A flexible formula for incorporating distributive concerns into cost-effectiveness analyses: priority weights 94%
- A Bayesian Susceptible-Infectious-Hospitalized-Ventilated-Recovered Model to Predict Demand for COVID-19 Inpatient Care in a Large Healthcare System 93%
- A scaling approach to estimate the COVID-19 infection fatality ratio from incomplete data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-state network meta-analysis of cause-specific survival data 94%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 93%
- A Markov Chain approach for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- paramix : An R package for parameter discretisation in compartmental models, with application to calculating years of life lost 94%
- Is mammography screening beneficial: An individual-based stochastic model for breast cancer incidence and mortality 92%
- Estimating the Cumulative Incidence of COVID-19 in the United States Using Four Complementary Approaches 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.