Association of olfactory dysfunction with hospitalization for COVID-19: a multicenter study in Kurdistan
Zobairy, H.; Shamsoddin, E.; Rasouli, M. A.; Veisi Khodlan, N.; Moradi, G.; Zareie, B.; Teymori, S.; Asadi, J.; Sofi-Mahmudi, A.; Sedaghat, A. R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of olfactory dysfunction (OD) with hospitalization for COVID-19. Study DesignMulti-center cohort study. SettingEmergency departments of thirteen COVID-19-designed hospitals in Kurdistan province, Iran. Subjects and MethodsPatients presenting with flu-like symptoms who tested positive by RT-PCR for COVID-19 between May 1st and 31st, 2020. At the time of presentation and enrollment, patients were asked about the presence of OD, fever, cough, shortness of breath, headache, rhinorrhea and sore throat. The severity of OD was assessed on an 11-point scale from 0 (none) to 10 (anosmia). Patients were either hospitalized or sent home for outpatient care based on standardized criteria. ResultsOf 203 patients, who presented at a mean of 6 days into the COVID-19 disease course, 25 patients (12.3%) had new OD and 138 patients (68.0%) were admitted for their COVID-19. Patients admitted for COVID-19 had a higher prevalence of all symptoms assessed, including OD (p<0.05 in all cases), and OD identified admitted patients with 84.0% sensitivity and 34.3% specificity. On univariate logistic regression, hospitalization was associated with OD (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47, 95%CI: 1.085-6.911, p=0.049). However, hospitalization for COVID-19 was not associated with OD (OR=3.22, 95% CI: 0.57-18.31, p=0.188) after controlling for confounding demographics and comorbidities. ConclusionOD may be associated with hospitalization for (and therefore more severe) COVID-19. However, this association between OD and COVID-19 severity is more likely driven by patient characteristics linked to OD, such as greater numbers of COVID-19 symptoms experienced or high-risk comorbidities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 95%
- Persisting Chemosensory Impairments in 366 Healthcare Workers Following COVID-19: An 11-Month Follow-up 94%
- Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19 positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 94%
- The association between dysnatraemia during hospitalisation and post COVID-19 mental fatigue 92%
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 increases over 5 months in patients with anosmia/dysgeusia 90%
- A longitudinal seroprevalence study in a large cohort of working adults reveals that neutralising SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies persist for at least six months independent of the severity of symptoms 89%
- Thyroid dysfunction diagnosis from routine laboratory tests based on machine learning 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced Olfactory Bulb Volume Accompanies Smelling Dysfunction After Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Hamburg City Health Study COVID Program 92%
- More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Metatranscriptomic Insights into Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Asymptomatic COVID-19 Cases 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.