Back

A rapid ecological assessment for necrophagous flies (Diptera, Calyptratae) in a mosaic landscape of the Colombian Andes

Amat, E.; Medina, C. A.

2020-07-26 ecology
10.1101/2020.07.24.220491 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A necrophagous flies ensemble (Diptera, Calyptratae) was rapidly assessed in four coverages of an anthropogenic landscape in the east range of the Colombian Andes. Ninetyseven individuals belonging to eight species were collected in only two hours of sampling. The highest diversity values and the occurrence of asynanthropic flies in the forest under conservation management may reflect a positively natural restoration process in the area assessed. Grassland, rural and urban coverages were similarly low in diversity and composition. A brief discussion about the flies bionomy and their environment association is offered. Necrophagous flies ensembles by coverage behave as an indicator of the anthropic impact on the landscape.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
56.1%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
● 466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Insects
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Parasites & Vectors
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
8
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
10
Acta Tropica
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
11
BMC Ecology and Evolution
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
12
Biotropica
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
13
Insect Conservation and Diversity
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Plants
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Ecological Entomology
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
16
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.