Back

Impact of patient engagement on the design of a mobile health technology for cardiac surgery

Chudyk, A. M.; Ragheb, S.; Kent, D.; Duhamel, T.; Hyra, C.; Dave, M.; Arora, R.; Schultz, A.

2020-07-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.22.20159848
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to describe the impact of patient engagement on the initial design and content of a mobile health (mHealth) technology that supports enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for cardiac surgery. MethodsEngagement occurred at the level of consultation and took the form of an advisory panel. Patients that underwent cardiac surgery (2017-2018) at St. Boniface Hospital (Winnipeg, Manitoba) and consented to be contacted about future research, and their caregivers, were approached for participation. A qualitative exploration was undertaken to determine advisory panel members key messages about, and the impact of, patient engagement on mHealth technology design and content. ResultsTen individuals participated in the advisory panel. Key design-specific messages centered around access, tracking, synchronization, and reminders. Key content-specific messages centered around roles of cardiac surgery team members and medical terms, educational videos, information regarding cardiac surgery procedures, travel before/after surgery, nutrition (i.e., what to eat), medications (i.e., drug interactions), resources (i.e., medical devices), and physical activity (i.e., addressing fears and providing information, recommendations, and instructions). These key messages were a rich source of information for mHealth technology developers and were incorporated as supported by the existing capabilities of the underlying technology platform. ConclusionsPatient engagement facilitated the development of a mHealth technology whose design and content were driven by the lived experiences of cardiac surgery patients and caregivers. The result was a detail-oriented and patient-centered mHealth technology that helps to empower and inform patients and their caregivers about the patient journey across the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. KEY QUESTIONS What is already known about this subject?Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have been proposed as a clinical strategy to effectively address complex and multi-system vulnerabilities, like those commonly present in older adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to improve delivery and patient experience with ERPs, but their development in the academic research setting is often limited by a lack of end-user (e.g., i.e., patient and caregiver) involvement. What does this study add?To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to engage patients and caregivers in the development of a mHealth technology that supports ERPs for cardiac surgery. This study describes a process for engaging patients and caregivers as "co-producers" of a mHealth technology to support delivery of ERPs during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. It also demonstrates that engaging patients and caregivers in research, through the formation of an advisory panel, yields a rich source of information to guide the design and content of mHealth technologies in cardiac research. How might this impact on clinical practice?In an era in which mHealth technologies are being increasingly looked to for the optimization of healthcare delivery, this study underscores the utility of using patient and caregiver voices to drive the development of patient-centered mHealth technologies to support clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 9%
12.4%
2
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 0.2%
11.1%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 51%
10.1%
4
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.1%
5
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
8
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 6%
2.9%
9
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
14
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 84%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
27
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Archives of Public Health
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
0.7%