Back

Simulating drug effects on blood glucose laboratory test time series with a conditional WGAN

Yahi, A.; Tatonetti, N. P.

2020-07-21 health informatics
10.1101/2020.07.19.20157321 medRxiv
Show abstract

The unexpected effects of medications has led to more than 14 million drug adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the past 10 years in the United States alone, with a little over 1.3 million of them linked to death, and represents a medical and financial burden on our healthcare. Laboratory tests have the potential to capture inter-individual variability in drug responses, but a significant portion of the patient population has unique treatment pathways that impedes forecasting and optimal decision making. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are flexible implicit generative models that have demonstrated their ability to capture complex correlations in field like computer vision and natural language. Their latent representation capacity is an opportunity for drug effect simulation on laboratory test trajectories. In this paper, we developed and evaluated conditional GANs on glucose laboratory tests in patients exposed to drug combinations and showed a proof of concept for these models in the simulation of unseen drug combinations. By using conditional Wasserstein GANs (WGANs) to simulate drug effects in laboratory tests, we hope to pave the way for novel clinical decision support (CDM) systems and enable the development of better predictive models for rare cohorts of patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.9%
3
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
4
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.4%
10
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%