Back

Trends of in-hospital and 30-day mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in England before and after the COVID-19 era

Mohamed, M. O.; Kinnaird, T.; Curzen, N.; Ludman, P.; Wu, J.; Rashid, M.; Shoaib, A.; de Belder, M.; Deanfield, J.; Gale, C.; Mamas, M. A.

2020-07-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.18.20155549 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo examine short-term primary causes of death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a national cohort before and during COVID-19. BackgroundPublic reporting of PCI outcomes is a performance metric and a requirement in many healthcare systems. There are inconsistent data on the causes of death after PCI, and what proportion of these are attributable to cardiac causes. MethodsAll patients undergoing PCI in England between 1st January 2017 and 10th May 2020 were retrospectively analysed (n=273,141), according to their outcome from the date of PCI; no death and in-hospital, post-discharge, and 30-day death. ResultsThe overall rates of in-hospital and 30-day death were 1.9% and 2.8%, respectively. The rate of 30-day death declined between 2017 (2.9%) and February 2020 (2.5%), mainly due to lower in-hospital death (2.1% vs. 1.5%), before rising again from 1st March 2020 (3.2%) due to higher rates of post-discharge mortality. Only 59.6% of 30-day deaths were due to cardiac causes, the most common being acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock and heart failure, and this persisted throughout the study period. 10.4% of 30-day deaths after 1st March 2020 were due to confirmed COVID-19. ConclusionsIn this nationwide study, we show that 40% of 30-day deaths are due to non-cardiac causes. Non-cardiac deaths have increased even more from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with one in ten deaths from March 2020 being COVID-19 related. These findings raise a question of whether public reporting of PCI outcomes should be cause-specific.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.0%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
21
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%