Towards More Reliable Unsupervised Tissue Segmentation Via Integrating Mass Spectrometry Imaging and Hematoxylin-Erosin Stained Histopathological Image
Guo, A.; Chen, Z.; Li, F.; Li, W.; Luo, Q.
Show abstract
Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI) provides a useful tool to divide a tissue section into sub-regions with similar molecular profiles, namely tissue segmentation. However, owing to the lack of ground truth, there is no reliable evaluation approach to assess the validity of unsupervised segmentation outcomes of MSI. We propose a novel solution grounded on a presumption that a segmentation is reliable if it can be reproduced using distinct bio-information extracted from independent sources. Specifically, besides molecular information from MSI data, we also obtain morphological information over a tissue section from its Hematoxylin-Erosin (H&E) stained histopathological image. MSI has high molecular specificity but low spatial resolving power, the H&E image has no molecular specificity but it can capture microscopic details of the tissue with a spatial resolution two magnitudes higher than MSI. The whole H&E image is split into an array of small patches, which correspond to the spatial pixels of MSI. A spectrum of informative morphological features is computed iteratively for each patch and spatial segmentation can be generated by clustering the patches based on their morphological similarities. Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI) score measures the degree of agreement between MSI-based and H&E image-based segmentation outcomes, which is defined by us as an objective and quantitative evaluation metric of segmentation validity. We investigated various candidate morphological features: a combination of Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN) features and handcrafted Threshold Adjacency Statistics (TAS) features finally stood out. The most appropriate number of tissue segments was also determined according to AMI score. Moreover, we introduced Co-Clustering algorithm to MSI data to simultaneously group m/z variables and spatial pixels, so potential biomarkers associated to each sub-region were discovered without the need of further analysis. Eventually, by integrating the segmentation outcomes based on MSI and H&E image data, the confidence level of the segment assignment was displayed for each pixel, which offered a much more informative and compelling way to present the segmentation results.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable dimensionality reduction and classification of mass spectrometry imaging data in a visceral pain model via non-negative matrix factorization 97%
- Semantic Segmentation of HeLa Cells: An Objective Comparison between one Traditional Algorithm and Three Deep-Learning Architectures 95%
- XFlow: An algorithm for extracting ion chromatograms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SPCS: A Spatial and Pattern Combined Smoothing Method of Spatial Transcriptomic Expression 94%
- Blood-based transcriptomic signature panel identification for cancer diagnosis: Benchmarking of feature extraction methods 93%
- Gene Expression Prediction from Histology Images via Hypergraph Neural Networks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast alignment of mass spectra in large proteomics datasets, capturing dissimilarities arising from multiple complex modifications of peptides 94%
- PartSeg, a Tool for Quantitative Feature Extraction From 3D Microscopy Images for Dummies 93%
- Fast and robust imputation for miRNA expression data using constrained least squares 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Biomarker Candidate Discovery in Imaging Mass Spectrometry Data Through Spatially Localized Shapley Additive Explanations 96%
- Heterogeneous multimeric metabolite ion species observed in LC-MS based metabolomics data sets 91%
- Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy-Assisted Lateral Flow Test for Adenine and IgG Analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.