Back

The Effect of Refractive Blur in the Vividness of Mental Imagery

Suresh, T.; Roy, A.; Shaikh, A. I. A.; Rajkumar, J. L.; Mathew, V.; Prabhakar, A. T.

2020-07-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.07.17.208017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVisual mental imagery or "seeing with the minds eye" is an everyday phenomenon. Visual mental imagery and visual perception share common neural-networks. Hence deficits that affect the visual perception may also affect visual mental imagery. AimWe aimed to study the effect of refractive blur on the vividness of mental imagery. MethodsSubjects were recruited from volunteers and divided into two groups; individuals with refractive errors-Ametropes(AM), and individuals without refractive errors - Emmetropes(EM). After filling in the Verbalizer-Visualizer-Questionnaire (VVQ), the subjects were asked to perform a mental imagery task with and without refractive blur. The participants were asked to generate a mental image of a specific object initially with eyes closed, eyes open and then with refractive blur in random order, and then judge the vividness of the mental image on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (low vividness) to 5 (good vividness). The EM participants had to wear a + 2D spectacles to produce refractive blur. ResultsA total of 162 participants were recruited to the study. Of these 73 were EM and 89 were AM. Of the AM, 30 had additional astigmatism. The mean VVQ score was 64.9(11.2). The mean refractive error was 1.8(1.3)D. Following the mental imagery task, at baseline with eyes closed, 138 (85.5%)subjects had vivid mental imagery close to visual perception(Likert scale:5). With the opening of the eyes, the vividness dropped by at least 1 point in the Likert scale in 139(85.8%). With the introduction of refractive blur, 153(94.4%) subjects had a drop in the vividness of the image by at least 1 point and 22(13.6%) subjects by at least 2 points. ConclusionIntroduction of refractory blur results in the reduction of the vividness of mental imagery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.0%
2
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.6%
4
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%