Back

A cross-sectional case-control study of sexual dysfunction and associated depression in postmenopausal incontinent women.

KAUR, T.; KUMARI, R.; SHARMA, J. B.; PANDEY, K.; UPPAL, B.; SINHA, D. K.; ANUKRITI, K.

2020-07-18 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2020.07.16.20155564 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFemale sexual dysfunction (FSD) has higher prevalence in postmenopausal women especially with urinary incontinence (UI) and coital incontinence (CI). This study was attempted as there is dearth of literature to quantify FSD, CI and depression in UI women and their correlation with each other especially in Indian scenario. AimAim of this study was to determine the prevalence of FSD, CI and depression in postmenopausal UI women. Material and MethodsCross-sectional case-control study of 100 menopausal women with previously diagnosed UI with matching controls over period of 3 months were analyzed for the prevalence of FSD, CI and depression using validated questionnaires like Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Primary Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Statistical Analysis was performed using SPSS version 19.0. ResultsUI is independently associated with FSD, CI and depression (p < 0.001) with prevalence of 100%, 83%, and 100% respectively for cases versus 5%, 6%, and 4% respectively for controls. FSD and CI are also independently associated with depression (p < 0.001). Combined FSD with UI and CI with UI are also significantly associated with depression. ConclusionUI is independently associated with FSD, CI and depression. FSD and CI are also independently associated with depression. UI is the major determinant of depression in those with both FSD and UI or CI and UI. Key Message PointsO_LIFemale sexual dysfunction is rampant in menopausal women especially the ones who are incontinent, which jeopardizes their quality of life. C_LIO_LISexually dysfunctional incontinent females feel socially outcast and are moderate to severely depressed and need addressal. C_LI There is a dearth of literature as regards to this issue in the society which needs to be explored, hence an attempt has been made

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.