Back

Estimating the size of undetected cases of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Europe: An upper bound estimator

Rocchetti, I.; Boehning, D.; Holling, H.; Maruotti, A.

2020-07-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.07.14.20153445
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile the number of detected SARS-CoV-2 infections are widely available, an understanding of the extent of undetected cases is urgently needed for an effective tackling of the pandemic. The aim of this work is to estimate the true number of SARS-CoV-2 (detected and undetected) infections in several European Countries. The question being asked is: How many cases have actually occurred? MethodsWe propose an upper bound estimator under cumulative data distributions, in an open population, based on a day-wise estimator that allows for heterogeneity. The estimator is data-driven and can be easily computed from the distributions of daily cases and deaths. Uncertainty surrounding the estimates is obtained using bootstrap methods. ResultsWe focus on the ratio of the total estimated cases to the observed cases at April 17th. Differences arise at the Country level, and we get estimates ranging from the 3.93 times of Norway to the 7.94 times of France. Accurate estimates are obtained, as bootstrap-based intervals are rather narrow. ConclusionsMany parametric or semi-parametric models have been developed to estimate the population size from aggregated counts leading to an approximation of the missed population and/or to the estimate of the threshold under which the number of missed people cannot fall (i.e. a lower bound). Here, we provide a methodological contribution introducing an upper bound estimator and provide reliable estimates on the dark number, i.e. how many undetected cases are going around for several European Countries, where the epidemic spreads differently.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 46%
11.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 1%
10.2%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 0.6%
7.6%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 0.8%
6.4%
6
Swiss Medical Weekly
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
13
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
14
European Journal of Epidemiology
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 9%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
20
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 25%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
27
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 22%
0.8%
28
Epidemiology
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
0.7%