A Quantitative Lung Computed Tomography Image Feature for Multi-Center Severity Assessment of COVID-19
Ghosh, B.; Kumar, N.; Singh, N.; Sadhu, A. K.; Ghosh, N.; Mitra, P.; Chatterjee, J.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions and congested healthcare systems globally. Hence an objective severity assessment is crucial in making therapeutic decisions judiciously. Computed Tomography (CT)-scans can provide demarcating features to identify severity of pneumonia --commonly associated with COVID-19--in the affected lungs. Here, a quantitative severity assessing chest CT image feature is demonstrated for COVID-19 patients. An open-source multi-center Italian database1 was used, among which 60 cases were incorporated in the study (age 27-86, 71% males) from 27 CT imaging centers. Lesions in the form of opacifications, crazy-paving patterns, and consolidations were segmented. The severity determining feature --Lnorm was quantified and established to be statistically distinct for the three --mild, moderate, and severe classes (p-value<0.0001). The thresholds of Lnorm for a 3-class classification were determined based on the optimum sensitivity/specificity combination from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses. The feature Lnorm classified the cases in the three severity categories with 86.88% accuracy. Substantial to almost-perfect intra-rater and inter-rater agreements were achieved involving expert and non-expert based evaluations ({kappa}-score 0.79-0.97). We trained machine learning based classification models and showed Lnorm alone has a superior diagnostic accuracy over standard image intensity and texture features. Classification accuracy was further increased when Lnorm was used for 2-class classification i.e. to delineate the severe cases from non-severe ones with a high sensitivity (97.7%), and specificity (97.49%). Therefore, key highlights of this severity assessment feature are accuracy, lower dependency on expert availability, and wide utility across different imaging centers.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics 99%
- Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images 95%
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 97%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 97%
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 96%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 96%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 97%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 95%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.