Back

A Quantitative Lung Computed Tomography Image Feature for Multi-Center Severity Assessment of COVID-19

Ghosh, B.; Kumar, N.; Singh, N.; Sadhu, A. K.; Ghosh, N.; Mitra, P.; Chatterjee, J.

2020-10-16 health informatics
10.1101/2020.07.13.20152231 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions and congested healthcare systems globally. Hence an objective severity assessment is crucial in making therapeutic decisions judiciously. Computed Tomography (CT)-scans can provide demarcating features to identify severity of pneumonia --commonly associated with COVID-19--in the affected lungs. Here, a quantitative severity assessing chest CT image feature is demonstrated for COVID-19 patients. An open-source multi-center Italian database1 was used, among which 60 cases were incorporated in the study (age 27-86, 71% males) from 27 CT imaging centers. Lesions in the form of opacifications, crazy-paving patterns, and consolidations were segmented. The severity determining feature --Lnorm was quantified and established to be statistically distinct for the three --mild, moderate, and severe classes (p-value<0.0001). The thresholds of Lnorm for a 3-class classification were determined based on the optimum sensitivity/specificity combination from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses. The feature Lnorm classified the cases in the three severity categories with 86.88% accuracy. Substantial to almost-perfect intra-rater and inter-rater agreements were achieved involving expert and non-expert based evaluations ({kappa}-score 0.79-0.97). We trained machine learning based classification models and showed Lnorm alone has a superior diagnostic accuracy over standard image intensity and texture features. Classification accuracy was further increased when Lnorm was used for 2-class classification i.e. to delineate the severe cases from non-severe ones with a high sensitivity (97.7%), and specificity (97.49%). Therefore, key highlights of this severity assessment feature are accuracy, lower dependency on expert availability, and wide utility across different imaging centers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.