Back

Quantifying Respiratory Airborne Particle Dispersion Control Through Improvised Reusable Masks: The Physics of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Reducing SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Airborne Transmission

Edwards, N. J.; Widrick, R.; Potember, R.; Gerschefske, M.

2020-08-17 public and global health
10.1101/2020.07.12.20152157 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFor much of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, many countries have struggled to offer definitive guidance on the wearing of masks or face coverings to reduce the highly infectious disease transmission resulting from a lack of compelling evidence on the effectiveness of communities wearing masks, and slow acceptance that aerosols are a primary SARS-CoV-2 disease transmission mechanism. Recent studies have shown that masks have been effective in several countries and populations, leaving only a lack of quantitative data on the control of airborne dispersion from human exhalation. This current study specifically has the objective to quantify the effectiveness of non-medical grade washable masks or face coverings in controlling airborne dispersion from exhalation (both droplet and aerosol) by measuring changes in direction, particle cloud velocities, and concentration. DesignThis randomized effectiveness study used a 10% NaCl nebulized polydisperse particle solution (0.3 m up to 10 m in size) delivered by an exhalation simulator to conduct 94 experiment runs with combinations of 8 different fabrics, 5 mask designs, and airflows for both talking and coughing. Multiple particle sensors were instrumented to measure reduction in aerosol dispersion. ResultsThree-way multivariate analysis of variance establishes that fabric, mask design, and exhalation breath level have a statistically significant effect on changing direction, reducing velocity, or concentrations of airborne particles (Fabric: P = < .001, Wilks {Lambda} = .000; Mask design: P = < .001, Wilks' {Lambda} = .000; Breath level: P = < .001, Wilks' {Lambda} = .004). There were also statistically significant interaction effects between combinations of all primary factors. Conclusions and RelevanceThe application of facial coverings or masks can significantly reduce the airborne dispersion of aerosolized particles from exhalation by diffusing the particle cloud direction and slow down its travel speed. Consequently, the results indicate that wearing masks when coupled with social distance can decrease the potentially inhaled dose of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols or droplets especially where infectious contaminants may exist in shared air spaces. The conclusion is well aligned with the concept of "time-distance-shielding" from hazardous materials emergency response. However, the effectiveness varies greatly between the specific fabrics and mask designs used.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.3%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
10
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
12
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%