Back

Negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep quantitative parameters, quality, and circadian alignment: Implications for psychological well-being and emotional regulation

Salehinejad, M. A.; Majidinezhad, M.; Ghanavati, E.; Kouestanian, S.; Vicario, C. M.; Nitsche, M. A.; Nejati, V.

2020-07-11 public and global health
10.1101/2020.07.09.20149138 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide, affecting millions of people and exposing them to home quarantine, isolation, and social distancing. While recent reports showed increased distress and depressive/anxiety state related to COVID-19 crisis, we investigated how home quarantine affected sleep parameters in healthy individuals. Methods160 healthy individuals who were in home quarantine in April 2020 for at least one month participated in this study. Participants rated and compared their quantitative sleep parameters (time to go to bed, sleep duration, getting-up time) and sleep quality factors, pre-and during home quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, participants chronotype was determined to see if sleep parameters are differentially affected in different chronotypes. ResultsThe time to fall asleep and get-up in the morning were significantly delayed in all participants, indicating a significant circadian misalignment. Sleep quality was reported to be significantly poorer in all participants and chronotypes, and included more daily disturbances (more sleep disturbances, higher daily dysfunctions due to low quality of sleep) and less perceived sleep quality (lower subjective sleep quality, longer time taken to fall asleep at night, more use of sleep medication for improving sleep quality) during home quarantine. ConclusionsHome quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemic has a detrimental impact on sleep quality. Online interventions including self-help sleep programs, stress management, relaxation practices, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, and mindfulness training are available interventions in the current situation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
7
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
18
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%