Back

Early Identification of Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department using Electronic Health Record Phenotyping

Shung, D.; Tsay, C.; Laine, L.; Thomas, P.; Partridge, C.; Simonov, M.; Hsiao, A.; Taylor, R. A.

2020-07-07 gastroenterology
10.1101/2020.07.06.20136374 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimGuidelines recommend risk stratification scores in patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but such scores are uncommonly employed in practice. Automation and deployment of risk stratification scores in real time within electronic health records (EHRs) would overcome a major impediment. This requires an automated mechanism to accurately identify ("phenotype") patients with GIB at the time of presentation. The goal is to identify patients with acute GIB by developing and evaluating EHR-based phenotyping algorithms for emergency department (ED) patients. MethodsWe specified criteria using structured data elements to create rules for identifying patients, and also developed a natural-language-processing (NLP)-based algorithm for automated phenotyping of patients, tested them with tenfold cross-validation (n=7144) and external validation (n=2988), and compared them with the standard method for encoding patient conditions in the EHR, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). The gold standard for GIB diagnosis was independent dual manual review of medical records. The primary outcome was positive predictive value (PPV). ResultsA decision rule using GIB-specific terms from ED triage and from ED review-of-systems assessment performed better than SNOMED on internal validation (PPV=91% [90%-93%] vs. 74% [71%-76%], P<0.001) and external validation (PPV=85% [84%-87%] vs. 69% [67%-71%], P<0.001). The NLP algorithm (external validation PPV=80% [79-82%]) was not superior to the structured-datafields decision rule. ConclusionsAn automated decision rule employing GIB-specific triage and review-of-systems terms can be used to trigger EHR-based deployment of risk stratification models to guide clinical decision-making in real time for patients with acute GIB presenting to the ED.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
8
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%