Screening predictors of weight loss: an Integromics Approach
Joel Correa da Rosa; Jose O. Aleman; Jason Mohabir; Yupu Liang; Jan L Breslow; Peter R. Holt
Show abstract
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States but little is known about the mechanisms of weight gain and weight loss. Integration of “omics” data is becoming a popular tool to increase understanding in such complex phenotypes. Biomarkers come in abundance from high-throughput experiments, but small sample size is still is a serious limitation in clinical trials. It makes assessment of more realistic assumptions for complex relationships such as nonlinearity, interaction and normality more difficult. In the present study, we developed a strategy to screen predictors of weight loss from a multi-omics, high-dimensional and longitudinal dataset from a small cohort of subjects. Our proposal explores the combinatorial space of candidate biomarkers from different data sources with the use of first-order Spearman partial correlation coefficients. Statistics derived from the sample correlations are used to rank and select biomarkers, and to evaluate the relative importance of each data source. We tackle the small sample size problem by combining nonparametric statistics and dimensionality reduction techniques useful for omics data. We applied the proposed strategy to assess the relative importance of biomarkers from 6 different data sources: RNA-seq, RT-qPCR, metabolomics, fecal microbiome, fecal bile acid, and clinical data used to predict the rate of weight loss in 10 obese subjects provided an identical low-calorie diet in a hospital metabolic facility. The strategy has reduced an initial set of more than 40K biomarkers to a set of 61 informative ones across 3 time points: pre-study, post-study and changes from pre- to post-study. Our study sheds light on the relative importance of different omics to predict rates of weight loss. We showed that baseline fecal bile acids, and changes in RT-qPCR biomarkers from pre- to post-study are the most predictive data sources for the rate of weight loss.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.AbbreviationsBPSBiomarker Predictive ScoreGSEAGene Set Enrichment AnalysisGSVAGene Set Variation AnalysisRT-qPCRReal Time quantitative Polymerase Chain ReactionSATSubcutaneous Adipose TissueVLCDVery Low Calorie DietWLWeight LossView Full Text
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 94%
- Subtyping of common complex diseases and disorders by integrating heterogeneous data. Identifying clusters among women with lower urinary tract symptoms in the LURN study 94%
- Interpretable machine learning with tree-based Shapley additive explanations: application to metabolomics datasets for binary classification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal response characterization across individual multiomics profiles of prediabetic and diabetic subjects 94%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 93%
- Use of a graph neural network to the weighted gene co-expression network analysis of Korean native cattle 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- metGWAS 1.0: An R workflow for network-driven over-representation analysis between independent metabolomic and meta-genome wide association studies 94%
- Pathway Analysis Through Mutual Information 92%
- OBMeta: a comprehensive web server to analyze and validate gut microbial features and biomarkers for obesity-associated metabolic diseases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for protein leverage on Total Energy Intake, but not Body Mass Index, in a large cohort of older adults 91%
- The heritability of BMI varies across the range of BMI: a heritability curve analysis in a twin cohort 90%
- A healthy childhood environment helps to combat inherited susceptibility to obesity 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.