Back

HIV and risk of COVID-19 death: a population cohort study from the Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Western Cape Department of Health with National Institute for Communicable Diseases, South Africa, ; Davies, M.-A.

2020-07-03 hiv aids
10.1101/2020.07.02.20145185 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe effect of HIV co-infection on COVID-19 outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa is unknown. MethodsWe conducted a population cohort study using linked data from adults attending public sector health facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa. We used Cox-proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, location and comorbidities to examine the association between HIV and COVID-19 death among (i) public sector "active patients" ([≥]1 health visit in the 3 years before March 2020), (ii) laboratory-diagnosed COVID-19 cases and (iii) hospitalized COVID-19 cases. COVID-19 was diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for COVID-19 comparing HIV positive vs. negative adults using modelled population estimates. ResultsAmong 3,460,932 public sector patients (16% HIV positive), 22,308 were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 625 died. In adjusted analysis, HIV increased risk of COVID-19 mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]:2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.70; 2.70), with similar risks across strata of viral load and immunosuppression. increased HIV-associated risk of COVID-19 death remained when restricting to COVID-19 cases (aHR:1.70; 95%CI:132; 2.18) or hospitalized cases (aHR:1.45; 95%CI:1.14; 1.84). Current and previous tuberculosis also increased COVID-19 mortality risk (aHR [95%CI]:2.70 [1.81; 4.04] and 1.51 [1.18; 1.93] respectively). The SMR for COVID-19 death associated with HIV was 2.39 (95% CI:1.96; 2.86); population attributable fraction 8.5% (95%CI:6.1; 11.1). ConclusionHIV was associated with a doubling of COVID-19 mortality risk. While our findings may over-estimate the HIV-associated risk COVID-19 death due to residual confounding, people with HIV should be considered a high-risk group for COVID-19 management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%