Back

Modeling of collaterally sensitive drug cycles, and optimization of the drug effect in the spirit of adaptive therapy

Yoon, N.; Krishnan, N. P.; Scott, J. G.

2020-07-03 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.07.02.184952 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In previous work, we focused on the optimal therapeutic strategy with a pair of drugs which are collaterally sensitive to each other, that is, a situation in which evolution of resistance to one drug induces sensitivity to the other, and vice versa. [1] Here, we have extended this exploration to the optimal strategy with a collaterally sensitive drug sequence of an arbitrary length, N([≥] 2). To explore this, we have developed a dynamical model of sequential drug therapies with N drugs. In this model, tumor cells are classified as one of N subpopulations represented as {Ri|i = 1,2,..., N}. Each subpopulation, Ri, is resistant to Drug i and each subpopulation, Ri-1 (or RN, if i = 1), is sensitive to it, so that Ri increases under Drug i as it is resistant to it, and after drug-switching, decreases under Drug i + 1 as it is sensitive to that drug(s). Similar to our previous work examining optimal therapy with two drugs, we found that there is an initial period of time in which the tumor is shaped into a specific makeup of each subpopulation, at which time all the drugs are equally effective [Formula]. After this shaping period, all the drugs are quickly switched with duration relative to their efficacy in order to maintain each subpopulation, consistent with the ideas underlying adaptive therapy. [2, 3] Additionally, we have developed methodologies to administer the optimal regimen under clinical or experimental situations in which no drug parameters and limited information of trackable populations data (all the subpopulations or only total population) are known. The therapy simulation based on these methodologies showed consistency with the theoretical effect of optimal therapy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.