Back

Scale-free structure of cancer networks and their vulnerability to hub-directed combination therapy

Chen, A. X.; Zopf, C. J.; Mettetal, J.; Shyu, W. C.; Bolen, J.; Chakravarty, A.; Palani, S.

2020-07-01 systems biology
10.1101/2020.07.01.159657 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background The effectiveness of many targeted therapies is limited by toxicity and the rise of drug resistance. A growing appreciation of the inherent redundancies of cancer signaling has led to a rise in the number of combination therapies under development, but a better understanding of the overall cancer network topology would provide a conceptual framework for choosing effective combination partners. In this work, we explore the scale-free nature of cancer protein-protein interaction networks in 14 indications. Scale-free networks, characterized by a power-law degree distribution, are known to be resilient to random attack on their nodes, yet vulnerable to directed attacks on their hubs (their most highly connected nodes).Results Consistent with the properties of scale-free networks, we find that lethal genes are associated with ∼5-fold higher protein connectivity partners than non-lethal genes. This provides a biological rationale for a hub-centered combination attack. Our simulations show that combinations targeting hubs can efficiently disrupt 50% of network integrity by inhibiting less than 1% of the connected proteins, whereas a random attack can require inhibition of more than 30% of the connected proteins.Conclusions We find that the scale-free nature of cancer networks makes them vulnerable to focused attack on their highly connected protein hubs. Thus, we propose a new strategy for designing combination therapies by targeting hubs in cancer networks that are not associated with relevant toxicity networks.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
22.2%
2
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%