Back

Role of PARylation and PTEN Mutation on PARP and PARG Inhibitor Efficacy on Glioblastoma

Hermanowski, H.; Huebert, B.; Aldrighetti, C.; Hurley, J. K.; Quenet, D.

2020-07-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.06.30.180216 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary adult brain tumor, with a median survival of approximately 15 months. Despite novel therapeutic approaches, median survival has remained largely unchanged since the standard of care therapy for GBM was established nearly 15 years ago. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a prognostic biomarker of GBM. PTEN mutation is associated with defects in homologous recombination (HR), making it a candidate for targeted therapy by synthetic lethality (SL). The SL concept has been clinically validated in HR-deficient breast and ovarian cancers upon treatment with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP 1) inhibitors (PARPi). This inhibitor, as well as poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) inhibitors (PARGi), dysregulate PARylation post-translational modification, which plays a major role in DNA repair and genomic stability. To determine whether PARPi/PARGi promotes SL in GBM, this study investigated the effects of PARPi (veliparib and olaparib) and PARGi in GBM cells with wildtype versus mutant PTEN. Sensitivity to these drugs was analyzed in function of PTEN status. Specifically, PTEN-wildtype cells displayed higher levels of DNA damage after PARPi treatment compared to PTEN-mutant cells. However, focusing on DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, there was no indication of efficient activation of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). These findings highlight the complex relationship between PARylation and PTEN. Thus, our results do not support the SL between PARP/PARG inhibition and PTEN mutations in GBM cells in absence of other DNA damaging agents.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
2
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.7%
3
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
6
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Neoplasia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
DNA Repair
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Biochemical Pharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%