Back

Important effect of the X chromosome in genomic evaluations of reproductive traits in beef cattle

Solar Diaz, I. D. P.; Camargo, G. M. F. d.; Cruz, V. A. R. d.; Hermisdorff, I. D. C.; Carvalho, C. V. D.; Albuquerque, L. G. d.; Costa, R. B.

2020-07-02 genomics
10.1101/2020.06.30.178558 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of inclusion and the prediction ability of the X chromosome for reproductive (occurrence of early pregnancy - P16 and age at first calving - AFC) and andrological traits (scrotal circumference -SC) in a herd of Nellore beef cattle herd. 3,263 genotypes of females and males were used. Genomic prediction for SC, AFC and P16 was carried out considering two scenarios: 1) only autosomal markers or 2) autosomal + X chromosome markers. To evaluate the effect of inclusion of the X chromosome on selection, the responses to the selection performed were compared including or not the X chromosome in the evaluation of the traits. Higher heritability estimates were obtained for SC (0.40 and 0.31), AFC (0.11 and 0.09) and P16 (0.43 and 0.38) for the analyses including the X chromosome compared to those without. The percent reduction on mean genomic breeding values when selection was based on the results of analysis that did not include the X chromosome to 1, 5 and 10% of the top males, was for SC slightly more than 7% of the mean genomic breeding value of the selected animals. For P16, the loss can reach more than 4%, while this loss does not seem to be as important for AFC. Average predictive correlation of 0.79, 0.98 and 0.84 for SC, AFC and P16 was obtained, respectively. These estimates demonstrate that inclusion of the X chromosome in the analysis can improve the prediction of genomic breeding values, especially for SC.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.