Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on voice quality distinction: Evidence from analysis of disordered voices
Arjmandi, M. K.; Ghasemzadeh, H.; Dilley, L. C.
Show abstract
The ability to discern variations in voice quality from speech is important for effective talker identification and robust speech processing; yet, little is known about how faithfully acoustic information relevant to variations in talkers voice quality is transmitted through a cochlear implant (CI) device. The present study analyzed unprocessed and CI-simulated versions of sustained /a/ vowel sounds from two groups of individuals with normal and disordered voice qualities in order to explore the effects of CI speech processing on acoustic information relevant for the distinction of voice quality. The CI-simulated voices were created by processing the vowel sounds along with 4-, 8-, 12-, 16-, 22-, and 32-channel noise-vocoders. The variations in voice quality for each voice sound was characterized by calculating mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs). The effects of simulated CI speech processing on the acoustic distinctiveness between normal and disordered voices were then measured by calculating the Mahalanobis distance (MD) metric, as well as accuracy of support vector machines (SVMs) applied to MFCC features. The results showed that CI speech processing, as simulated by noise vocoding, is highly detrimental to the acoustic information involved in conveying voice quality distinctions. This supports the view that listeners with CIs will likely experience difficulties in perceiving voice quality variations due to the reduced spectral resolution, shedding light on challenges listeners with CIs may face for effective recognition and processing of talkers voices.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Air-Conduction And Bone-Conduction Reference Threshold Levels – A Multicenter Study 96%
- Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness 96%
- Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery 96%
- Neural correlates of masked and unmasked tones: psychoacoustics and late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) 95%
- Improved coherence measure for EEG-based speech tracking in hearing impaired listeners 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels 96%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 96%
- From Modulated Noise to Natural Speech: the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Frequency Following Response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supra-threshold perception and neural representation of tones presented in noise in conditions of masking release 95%
- Validation of morphological ear classification devised by principal component analysis using three-dimensional images for human identification 94%
- Exploring the distribution of statistical feature parameters for natural sound textures 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.