Evaluation Of The Abbott SARS-COV-2 Ig-G Assay.
Lau, C.; Hoo, S.; Liang, Y.; Aw, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionAntibodies to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can increase as soon as 10-13 days after infection. We describe our evaluation of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay on the Architect immunoassay analyser. MethodsWe assessed the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay in samples from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive patients and healthy healthcare workers. The manufacturer cut-off index (COI) of 1.4 was adopted to identify positive results. We examined the assay cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis C/hepatitis B) and rheumatoid factor (RF). The sample throughput of the Abbott assay was also assessed. ResultsThe Abbott assay showed excellent precision, with a CV of 3.4% for the negative control (COI = 0.06) and 1.6% for a high positive serum sample (COI = 8.6). Residual serum was available from 57 inpatients not initially suspected of having COVID-19, 29 of whom tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The Abbott assay has a sensitivity of 90.9-100% when tested in 54 subjects [≥]14 days post PCR positive, and a specificity of 100% (N = 358). There was no cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis C/hepatitis B) and RF. The Architect Abbott assay has a throughput of 100 samples in 70 minutes. ConclusionThe Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay shows excellent performance that is well within FDA and CDC guidelines when testing patients [≥]14 days POS with little cross-reactivity from other viral antibodies. There is some evidence that SARS-CoV-2 IgG develops early in the disease process. IMPACT STATEMENTWith the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still ongoing, laboratories are hard pressed to introduce SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing to help as an indirect marker for infection to identify patients with prior infection/exposure. The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay has excellent performance with good precision, specificity, and sensitivity [≥]14 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, with a competitive throughput of 100 samples in 70 minutes. It shows no cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies (influenza/dengue/hepatitis B/hepatitis C) and rheumatoid factor. We have also found evidence of early antibody development in some patients before they tested positive on the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 96%
- Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid whole-blood finger-stick IgM-IgGCombined Antibody Tests 95%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA Assay for detection of IgA and IgG antibodies 95%
- Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting 94%
- Clinical evaluation of the molecular-based BD SARS-CoV-2/Flu for the BD MAX™ System 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical Performance of the AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel 94%
- Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of Four Lateral Flow Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies 94%
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay 94%
- Diagnostic comparison of three fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay platforms for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 94%
- Comparative evaluation of six immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.