A Modelling Study for Designing a Multi-layered Surveillance Approach to Detect the Potential Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2
Liu, Y.; Gong, W.; Clifford, S.; Sundaram, M. E.; CMMID COVID19 Working Group, ; Jit, M.; Flasche, S.; Klepac, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundCountries achieving control of COVID-19 after an initial outbreak will continue to face the risk of SARS-CoV-2 resurgence. This study explores surveillance strategies for COVID-19 containment based on polymerase chain reaction tests. MethodsUsing a dynamic SEIR-type model to simulate the initial dynamics of a COVID-19 introduction, we investigate COVID-19 surveillance strategies among healthcare workers, hospital patients, and community members. We estimate surveillance sensitivity as the probability of COVID-19 detection using a hypergeometric sampling process. We identify test allocation strategies that maximise the probability of COVID-19 detection across different testing capacities. We use Beijing, China as a case study. FindingsSurveillance subgroups are more sensitive in detecting COVID-19 transmission when they are defined by more COVID-19 specific symptoms. In this study, fever clinics have the highest surveillance sensitivity, followed by respiratory departments. With a daily testing rate of 0.07/1000 residents, via exclusively testing at fever clinic and respiratory departments, there would have been 598 [95% eCI: 35, 2154] and 1373 [95% eCI: 47, 5230] cases in the population by the time of first case detection, respectively. Outbreak detection can occur earlier by including non-syndromic subgroups, such as younger adults in the community, as more testing capacity becomes available. InterpretationA multi-layer approach that considers both the surveillance sensitivity and administrative constraints can help identify the optimal allocation of testing resources and thus inform COVID-19 surveillance strategies. FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Health Research (UK), National Institute of Health (US), the Royal Society, and Wellcome Trust.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating COVID-19 cases and deaths prevented by non-pharmaceutical interventions in 2020-2021, and the impact of individual actions: a retrospective model-based analysis 95%
- Estimating the impact of test-trace-isolate-quarantine systems on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Australia 94%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling testing and response strategies for COVID-19 outbreaks in remote Australian Aboriginal communities 95%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 94%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in English care homes: a modelling study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The quarantine hospital strategy as a way to reduce both community and nosocomial transmission in the context of a COVID-like epidemic 94%
- Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies 94%
- Using real-time data to guide decision-making during an influenza pandemic: a modelling analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of COVID-19 in Australia to inform transmission reducing measures and health system preparedness 94%
- Global surveillance of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants 92%
- Daily Forecasting of New Cases for Regional Epidemics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 with Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19: an individual-based modelling study 94%
- Design of COVID-19 Staged Alert Systems to Ensure Healthcare Capacity with Minimal Closures 93%
- Assessing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures in Austrian schools by means of agent-based simulations calibrated to cluster tracing data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.