Back

A general approach for analysis of physiologically structured population models: the R package 'PSPManalysis'

de Roos, A. M.

2020-06-29 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.27.174722 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SummaryHow environmental conditions affect the life history of individual organisms and how these effects translate into dynamics of population and communities on ecological and evolutionary time scales is a central question in many eco-evolutionary studies.Physiologically structured population models (PSPMs) offer a theoretical approach to address such questions as they are built upon a function-based model of the life history, which explicitly describes how life history depends on individual traits as well as on environmental factors. PSPMs furthermore explicitly account for population feedback on these environmental factors, which translates into density-dependent effects on the life history. PSPMs can thus capture life histories in quite some detail but lead to population-level formulations in terms of partial differential equations that are generally hard to analyse.Here I present a general methodology and a R software package for computing how the ecological steady states of PSPMs depend on model parameters and to detect bifurcation points in the computed curves where dynamics change drastically. The package makes specifying the population model unnecessary and only requires a relatively straightforward implementation of the life history functions as input. It furthermore allows for analysing the evolutionary dynamics and evolutionary singular states of the PSPMs based on Adaptive Dynamics theory.Given the central role of the individual life history in many studies, there is substantial scope for using the presented methodology in fields as diverse as ecology, ecotoxicology, conservation biology and evolutionary biology, where it has already been applied to problems like the evolution of cannibalism, niche shifts and metamorphosis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
2
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
6
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
14
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
15
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 70%
1.0%
22
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
26
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%