Back

Vaporized H2O2 decontamination against surrogate viruses for the reuse of N95 respirators in the COVID-19 emergency

Oral, E.; Wannomae, K. K.; Connolly, R. L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Leung, H. M.; Muratoglu, O. K.; Durkin, J.; Jones, R.; Collins, C.; Gjore, J.; Budzilowicz, A.; Jaber, T.

2020-06-28 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2020.06.25.20140269 medRxiv
Show abstract

Decontamination of N95 respirators has become critical to alleviate PPE shortages for healthcare workers in the current COVID-19 emergency. The factors that are considered for the effective reuse of these masks are the fit, filter efficiency and decontamination/disinfection level both for SARS-CoV-2, which is the causative virus for COVID-19, and for other organisms of concern in the hospital environment such as Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridium difficile. In its guidance entitled Recommendations for Sponsors Requesting EUAs for Decontamination and Bioburden Reduction Systems for Surgical Masks and Respirators During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) Public Health Emergency (May 2020)[1], the FDA recommends a 6-log10 reduction in either the most resistant bacterial spores for the system or in a mycobacterium species to authorize the use of a decontamination method of N95 respirators for single or multiple users. While the goal is primarily inactivation against SARS-CoV-2, testing of decontamination methods against the virus may not always be available. For decontamination methods considered for only single users, the recommendation is a 6-log10 reduction in the infective virus concentration of 3 non-enveloped viruses or in the concentration of two Gram (+) and two Gram (-) bacteria. Based on these recommendations, we explored the efficacy of vaporized H2O2 (VHP) treatment of N95 respirators against surrogate viruses covering a wide range of disinfection resistance for emergency decontamination and reuse to alleviate PPE shortages for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 emergency.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
4
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
10
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
25
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%