Back

Transgressive segregation for salt tolerance in rice due to physiological coupling and uncoupling and genetic network rewiring

de los Reyes, B. G.; Pabuayon, I. C.; KItazumi, A.; Cushman, K. R.; Singh, R. K.; Gregorio, G. B.; Dhatt, B. K.; Zabet-Moghaddam, M.; Walia, H.

2020-06-26 genetics
10.1101/2020.06.25.171603 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transgressive segregation is common in plant breeding populations, where a small minority of recombinants are outliers relative to parental phenotypes. While this phenomenon has been attributed to complementation and epistatic effects, the physiological, biochemical, and molecular bases have not been fully illuminated. By systems-level scrutiny of the IR29 x Pokkali recombinant inbred population of rice, we addressed the hypothesis that novel salt tolerance phenotypes are created by positive or negative coupling or uncoupling effects and novel regulatory networks. Hyperspectral profiling distinguished the transgressive individuals in terms of stress penalty to growth. Non-parental network signatures that led to either optimal or non-optimal integration of developmental with stress-related mechanisms were evident at the macro-physiological, biochemical, metabolic, and transcriptomic levels. The large positive net gain in super-tolerant progeny was due to ideal complementation of beneficial traits, while shedding antagonistic traits. Super-sensitivity was explained by the stacking of multiple antagonistic traits and loss of major beneficial traits. The mechanisms elucidated in this study are consistent with the Omnigenic Theory, emphasizing the synergy or lack thereof between core and peripheral components. This study supports a breeding paradigm based on genomic modeling to create the novel adaptive phenotypes for the crops of the 21st century.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
3
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
18
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
25
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%