Optimization of cerebrospinal fluid microbial metagenomic sequencing diagnostics
Olausson, J.; Brunet, S.; Vracar, D.; Tian, Y.; Abrahamsson, S.; Meghadri, S. H.; Sikora, P.; Lind Karlberg, M.; Engstrom Jakobsson, H.; Tang, K.-W.
Show abstract
BackgroundInfection in the central nervous system is a severe condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite ample testing, the majority of encephalitis and meningitis cases remain undiagnosed. Metagenomic sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid has emerged as an unbiased approach to identify rare microbes and novel pathogens. However, several major hurdles remains, including establishment of individual limits of detection, removal of false positives and implementation of universal controls. ResultsTwenty-one cerebrospinal fluid samples, in which a known pathogen had been positively identified by available clinical techniques, were subjected to metagenomic DNA sequencing using massive parallel sequencing. Fourteen samples contained minute levels of Epstein-Barr virus. Calculation of the detection threshold for each sample was made using total leukocyte content in the sample and environmental contaminants found in bioinformatic classifiers. Virus sequences were detected in all ten samples, in which more than one read was expected according to calculations. Conversely, no viral reads were detected in seven out of eight samples, in which less than one read was expected according to calculations. False positive pathogens of computational or environmental origin were readily identified, by using a commonly available cell control. For bacteria additional filters including a comparison between classifiers removed the remaining false positives and alleviated pathogen identification. ConclusionsHere we show a generalizable method for detection and identification of pathogen species using metagenomic sequencing. The sensitivity for each sample can be calculated using the leukocyte count and environmental contamination. The choice of bioinformatic method mainly affected the efficiency of pathogen identification, but not the sensitivity of detection. Identification of pathogens require multiple filtering steps including read distribution, sequence diversity and complementary verification of pathogen reads.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebrospinal fluids from healthy pregnant women does not harbor a detectable microbial community 95%
- Targeted Hybridization Capture of SARS-CoV-2 and Metagenomics Enables Genetic Variant Discovery and Nasal Microbiome Insights 95%
- UltraSEQ: a universal bioinformatic platform for information-based clinical metagenomics and beyond 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nanopore Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Comparison of Short and Long PCR-tiling Amplicon Protocols 96%
- High throughput SARS-CoV-2 variant analysis using molecular barcodes coupled with Next Generation Sequencing 96%
- Origin of imported SARS-CoV-2 strains in The Gambia identified from whole genome sequences 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategy and performance evaluation of low-frequency variant calling for SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using targeted deep Illumina sequencing 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 within-host and in-vitro genomic variability and sub-genomic RNA levels indicate differences in viral expression between clinical and in-vitro cohorts. 94%
- German-wide interlaboratory study compares consistency, accuracy and reproducibility of whole-genome short read sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Respiratory Viral Panel: A Diagnostic and Epidemiologic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses. 95%
- Metaviromes reveal the dynamics of Pseudomonas host-specific phages cultured and uncultured by plaque assay 95%
- Metagenomic identification of viral sequences in laboratory reagents 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A highly effective reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
- Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva 93%
- Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the novel Xpert® Mpox (Cepheid®) and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX (SD Biosensor) molecular point-of-care assays for the detection of Mpox virus in skin lesion swabs and upper-respiratory swab samples 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.